Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 15:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maryamireadinggroup (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

First, I offered a correction. I stated Schuon was initiated by al-Alawi and not Guenon. For some reason Alexf deleted my correction. Second, I offered a hyperlink to a relevant website. In the future I will refrain from doing this.

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 08:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

To be unblocked, please use {{Unblock-un|username}} to request a new username, but please read through our username policy first. Usernames on our website must not be the same as a website, a company or other organization, or a group of people. Each person must have their own account, and accounts can't be shared between members of an organization or group. So, if you wanted to be "Joe at Widgets, Inc.", that would be a legal username because it identifies a specific person. However, "Widgets, Inc." is not allowed because it is the name of a company. The other reason you were blocked seems to be because you are suspected of being here to spam links to your website. If you agree not to do this in the future, we'll probably unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but your blog is not relevant in terms of our policy on external links. And your invitation for readers to go to your blog is spammy and unencyclopedic. You are welcome to link "in support of content cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Cheers, -- Deepfriedokra 23:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply