User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2012/June
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Martijn Hoekstra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for the feedback
at my successful RFA | |
Thank you, Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2012, for your feedback at my RFA. I'll try and be more flexible. (Oh, thanks for the chuckle at the edit summary; loved it!) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
Re: thanks
No problem. --Izno (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
WWI and WWII fighter aircraft pictures
Thank you Martijn for your effort to unblock me and for the info on an alternative means of making the pics and videos available. Is there some means of presenting the pics and videos in a link that one can follow from one of the text articles or related links to planes Of the "same" family?
If not, I suggest that a Wikipedia "virtual" pic and video storehouse be developed. Perhaps there is one already available, which is included in the text articles on the planes. Unless one can visit a aircraft museum, there is nno means for them to experience up close detailed images and fly-by videos.
I will save a link to this page and check back for response info.
Thank again for your efforts.
John Veit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5shot (talk • contribs) 01:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings. (This invitation sent because you signed up as a member of WP:UWTEST) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Viritidas
Hello Martijn, The reason I left that note to Vir stating that I no longer wish to interact with him is because he has repeatedly insulted me and others (in one edit summary calling my edits vandalism, describing others as shit), telling people they have no right to edit Wikipedia and numerous other reasons. On top of that, he has repeatedly violated the three revert rule here and in other articles. And I am not the only one in which he has acted this way. Reading his talk page, it would seem that there are at least 3-4 other people with whom he is engaging the same behaviors. A look at his edit history shows that a pattern of behavior that is consistently contrary to the five pillars.
While he and I have had heated discussions, in all of them I have never once interacted with him in a manner that does not assume good faith. The last straw was the profanity laden scree aimed at Neelix and others in the Hawaiian cuisine article. No matter how upset someone has become in a discussion, commentary such as that should never posted anywhere on Wikipedia. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)