User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2012/June

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jerem43 in topic Viritidas


Thanks for the feedback

  at my successful RFA
Thank you, Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2012, for your feedback at my RFA. I'll try and be more flexible. (Oh, thanks for the chuckle at the edit summary; loved it!) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: thanks

No problem. --Izno (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

WWI and WWII fighter aircraft pictures

Thank you Martijn for your effort to unblock me and for the info on an alternative means of making the pics and videos available. Is there some means of presenting the pics and videos in a link that one can follow from one of the text articles or related links to planes Of the "same" family?

If not, I suggest that a Wikipedia "virtual" pic and video storehouse be developed. Perhaps there is one already available, which is included in the text articles on the planes. Unless one can visit a aircraft museum, there is nno means for them to experience up close detailed images and fly-by videos.

I will save a link to this page and check back for response info.

Thank again for your efforts.

John Veit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5shot (talkcontribs) 01:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Level one user warnings. (This invitation sent because you signed up as a member of WP:UWTEST) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Viritidas

Hello Martijn, The reason I left that note to Vir stating that I no longer wish to interact with him is because he has repeatedly insulted me and others (in one edit summary calling my edits vandalism, describing others as shit), telling people they have no right to edit Wikipedia and numerous other reasons. On top of that, he has repeatedly violated the three revert rule here and in other articles. And I am not the only one in which he has acted this way. Reading his talk page, it would seem that there are at least 3-4 other people with whom he is engaging the same behaviors. A look at his edit history shows that a pattern of behavior that is consistently contrary to the five pillars.

While he and I have had heated discussions, in all of them I have never once interacted with him in a manner that does not assume good faith. The last straw was the profanity laden scree aimed at Neelix and others in the Hawaiian cuisine article. No matter how upset someone has become in a discussion, commentary such as that should never posted anywhere on Wikipedia. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 16:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)