Marky78

The article Dsw-shoes.html has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Sas shoes and other articles

A tag has been placed on Sas shoes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

The same tag has been put on Nine West Shoes, Womens Shoes, Merrell shoes and Www.insidethesports.com/1/tennis-shoes.html. Bonadea 15:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Sas shoes deleted by --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Deletion log summary: Deleted according to CSD:G11 (blatent advertising); content includes "http://www.insidethesports.com/2/sas-shoes.html SAS customer review: "Spend the money for really good shoes like SAS."

Sas-shoes.html also deleted by --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Deletion log summary: Deleted according to CSD:A3 (no content) created by same author as deleted Sas shoes which was blatent advertising; content here blanked by author

Lowa Boots

A tag has been placed on Lowa Boots, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BigDT 18:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Lowa Boots

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lowa Boots, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Lowa Boots. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. MikeMorley 19:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

(I did not realise that Lowa Boots had previously been speedied, and hence PRODed it MikeMorley 19:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC))

Lotto Shoes

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lotto Shoes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Lotto Shoes. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. MikeMorley 19:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Insidethesports.com links

Hi Marky78,

Please have a look at the [normally to be avoided] guideline. I think the insidethesports.com links you have placed in a number of shoe-related articles (several of which you created yourself, and which have been deleted) qualify as links to be avoided: they appear to be links that primarily exist to sell products or services, without any valuable informational content. Please don't add such links to Wikipedia. Thank you! Bonadea 19:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Adidas

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Adidas. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 20:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Indef blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)