MarkusJannssen
Welcome! edit
|
MarkusJannssen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not the same as Kindmind! I was told by him to put the content on Mufti Menk's page since he wasn't able to do it. So I agreed to do it for him because he needed help. Please, this has been a misunderstanding. I am NOT the same person as Kindmind, he's someone different. Please check our IPs to confirm that we live in different countries and have nothing to do with each other. I was pasting the same content as him because he wanted me to do that as he said the owners of Mufti Menk's page are defaming the scholar. So I decided to defend the scholar and agreed to do what he said. I'm sorry and I will not repeat this.
Decline reason:
In which case consider yourself blocked for meatpuppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 00:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
March 2018 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ismail ibn Musa Menk has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ismail ibn Musa Menk was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/muftimenk/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ismail ibn Musa Menk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dorsetonian (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
MarkusJannssen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that I had made a mistake. I was completely oblivious of the policies of Wikipedia. I wasn't aware that such an act is not allowed. I humbly apologize and will not do any such sort of violations in the future. I request for a second chance.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MarkusJannssen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia admins, I was blocked for sockpuppetry (suspected sockpuppet of Kindmind). I understand and I have thoroughly read the Wikipedia rules and regulations regarding what is meatpuppet and what is sockpuppet. I admit my mistake, I broke the rules of Wikipedia by trying to make edits on Mufti Ismail Menk's page but please understand that all I did was from a good intention. I had no idea I would end up like this and I had no idea before what sockpuppet or meatpuppet is. From here onwards, I promise to make useful contributions to Wikipedia and will not damage or disrupt any article or page therefore. I want a second chance.MarkusJannssen (talk) 12:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you at this time. There are too many issues. Setting aside the obvious, let's look at the question of what edits you would make. Your edit history here is not promising. I could not unblock without a topic ban on Ismail ibn Musa Menk. Your edit warring there and your failure to understand why your edits were not acceptable make it clear that it is a subject you must avoid. So you will also need to read and understand WP:edit war and WP:COI and explain how you would avoid that sort of editing. You must also tell us what sort of constructive edits you will make once unblocked. As to a second chance, your best hope IMHO is the WP:standard offer. Basically, wait for six months without editing or socking and then address the concerns that led to your block. If those concerns are addressed adequately, we may consider unblocking you. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MarkusJannssen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my final try in getting unblocked. I'll be revealing everything so you may know that I am innocent. I'm a personal fan of Wikipedia and I had always wanted to publish articles there and edit pages. However, I never learned it. However, one day this person Kindmind contacted me via an online freelancing jobs website (I'm a writer by profession and I work as a part-time freelancer). I was paid 46 GBP to make edits to Mufti Menk's page. As a Muslim myself and a defender of scholars, I was told that the authors of the page are posting wrong information about Mufti Menk and that that person himself is in contact with Mufti. I agreed to work for him and he sent me the content which was needed to be uploaded. Please remember that this was my first ever edit on Wikipedia and I had no idea about its rules. So, I just read the content and it seemed positive in nature to me and posted it. However, few hours later I saw my edits are removed and I really started to believe that person who gave me the work that the author of the page is really someone who intends wrong against Mufti Menk. Unfortunately, I undid his edits 3-4 times within 24 hours and got banned for sockpuppet suspicion. That guy did pay me the full money but he got banned from Wikipedia too. His last message to me was that he will be contacting a lawyer and will bring along Mufti Menk himself to solve this issue. But I told him that I will stay out of this because I am banned because of a very bad misunderstanding. If you want my chat logs with him, I can send you picture proofs. However, I really really wanted to continue making contributions to Wikipedia so I made another account from my second laptop. The account name was Milk4Ever. I contributed to the Wikipedia by creating 2 pages, one for an international boxer and one for an international footballer. The page I created for the footballer was approved by Wikipedia and I was very happy. The boxer page lacked references and I was working to fix it until I found myself banned on that account too. Now, please try to understand. I mean no harm to any of the pages or personalities in Wikipedia. I just intend good. It was extremely stupid of me to work for money and vandalize a public figure's page. It was my emotions taking control over me as I thought I am defending a scholar but I was actually doing it in a wrong way which got me banned. I am ready to co-operate and prove that ever since my ban as well, I have been making regular contributions to Wikipedia with my other accounts. I know multiaccounting is not allowed but I please try to understand, all I ever wanted to do was good. I never intended anything bad. It was my dream to publish and edit articles on Wikipedia and become a known editor but it all collapsed when I worked for money. Ever since that bad experience with the person who asked me to edit Mufti Menk's page, I've never taken money from anybody. People who don't know how to create Wikipedia pages, I teach them via Teamviewer how to do it. If they are not interested, I create the page by myself and then help them to edit the page. Please check this page which was created by me: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Siew I'm also planning to make some other pages but they are lacking sources so I'm asking help from others to help me in perfecting the article according to Wikipedia's policies before publishing it. This page was approved by Wikipedia and now it is officially controlled by the Malaysian Wikipedia football association. You can check the history. I no longer make any edits on that page since the MalaysianWiki handles that page now. Yes, I did make a third account too because I really want to continue contributing to Wikipedia. I know I am innocent but I also admit that what I did was wrong but humans make mistakes. I'm not perfect. I had no idea what I did was wrong but I got banned without getting a 2nd chance. This is my fourth appeal and if this does not get approved, I don't know what will convince you to help me. Please before making a decision on this appeal, try to understand what has happened. 1) I was paid to edit Mufti Menk's page 2) I engaged in an edit war as I was oblivious of Wikipedia's policies 3) I did get the edit war warning after which I stopped editing, I swear. You can check the Dorsetonian's message on my talk page and my last edit on Mufti Menk's page. 4) The next day I found myself banned for being a sockpuppet of Kindmind. I am NOT kindmind. He is the person who not only got himself banned but also me in an attempt to write good things about the scholar. It's not his fault either because he himself doesn't know how Wikipedia works. But I really don't care about him because I have nothing to do with him now. It's about me and my passion of helping Wikipedia 5) I tried to make a 2nd account and published a page which got approved (please try to understand, I mean no harm and I only want to contribute) 6) After 4 days my 2nd account got banned too 7) I then made a third account because I didn't wanted to give up so early. However, I cannot reveal the name of my third account until and unless I am assured that you guys understand my situation. If I wanted to vandalize the Wikipedia articles, I could've done it long ago from my 2nd and 3rd account but instead I used them to publish useful articles. Also, the articles I've published have nothing to do with Mufti Menk. As I said, this is my final try to get unbanned. In case my ban appeal is accepted, I'll reveal my third account and request the deletion of MarkusJannssen, 2nd account and my 3rd account. The 2nd account does have some successfully published articles like http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Siew but I guess. I haven't ever used my personal email to create an account on Wikipedia. So I'll create my personal account and that will be the final account. My final words are: I am a human, I can make mistakes. If you don't give me a chance to learn, I will not be able to improve myself. Please, know that when you first time came to Wikipedia, you were not perfect either. I agree I made mistakes but I've apologized for it so many times and I'm again apologizing. Hoping for a positive response. MarkusJannssen (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Continued socking. Please see Sampanoura --Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'll note for the reviewing administrator, while filing this appeal, stating that they've read and understood policies, they've socked on not only one, but two accounts. Please see Sampanoura. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)