Nakasone

edit

His change of command has already been discussed before. The official promotion and change of command for Nakasone to assume command of NSA/CSS/USCYBERCOM is on May 4, 2018 as states here. Neovu79 (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

More information can also be found on the List of active duty United States four-star officers#List of pending appointments Neovu79 (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I am not looking to start a revert war over this, since May 4th, Nakasone will receive his fourth star and will be sworn in as NSA/CSS/USCYBERCOM new head. Becuase at that time, the information that you placed with be corrected with the right date. Military officers are not politicians and do not assume office immediately after they are confirmed by the Senate. Neovu79 (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring at Paul Nakasone and Michael S. Rogers

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Markfletch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Markfletch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markfletch (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not blocked but I can’t edit because of my IP address being blocked. Can someone tell me where to go to get this sorted out? Markfletch (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2018

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
AGK ■ 21:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply