This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mark Van Pelt (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unfounded accusation of sockpuppetry

Decline reason:

Editing pattern seems clear that sock or meat puppetry is going on (we treat both as the same). Your confidence that CheckUser will exonerate you suggests that this is meat. Nevertheless, the suspicion that sock/meat is being used abusively is enough to block on, so this request is declined. --ЯEDVERS 15:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My account has been blocked indefinitely due to an accusation of sockpuppetry that has not been proven. I am not a sockpuppet of any existing Wikipedia user. Mark Van Pelt 15:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply