Marian of WOOMB

Thanks for creating a new username; this one seems acceptable. I would only add that if you are a paid representative of WOOMB, Wikipedia's Terms of Use require you to comply with the paid editing policy. If you are not paid, you can disregard that, though you still need to review the conflict of interest policy if you haven't already. Any questions, feel free to ask. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, Marian of WOOMB. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Billings ovulation method— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 03:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Billings ovulation method, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 00:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Billings ovulation method, you may be blocked from editing. Since your username indicates that you likely have a conflict of interest, you should be very careful in editing this article. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

I've restored the link to the Linacre Quarterly article. If you're alleging copyvio, can you be more specific about where this journal copied the text from? I'd also be curious how it made it to publication without the infringement you're alleging being detected. —C.Fred (talk) 00:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)