User talk:Marialopez pabon/sandbox

It is difficult to understand the concepts that you are trying to explain. In the "methods" section I see you are trying to explain the history of Mendel´s and further experiments. If you worked on the flow of the text, it would come together nicely. I suggest you check the grammar tenses. Do not forget to add references.

Tbento2015 (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)tbento215Tbento2015 (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Very informative and I appreciate the separation of information into the subheadings. Remember to capitalize some of these headings like introduction. I agree that some of the flow of the text seems to be awkward, but could be easily fixed by some rearrangement. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewells2013 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

I made a few grammatical changes but I was somewhat limited to what I could do because I didn't understand the context of most of the writing. Also, try to add your sources as well. Ncameron2013 (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)NCameron2013

This is nice and simple writing. One suggestion is that if you are going to add more information on the techniques used in the study of classic genetics, I recommend that you mention the various features of the different methods, to allow comparisons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrarSoaad (talk • contribs) 00:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)