Maria Vampatella

File:Anthony-Di-Pietro-speaking-at-Melbourne-Victory.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anthony-Di-Pietro-speaking-at-Melbourne-Victory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion pending for File:Anthony-Di-Pietro-speaking-at-Melbourne-Victory.jpg

Hello, Maria Vampatella. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Anthony-Di-Pietro-speaking-at-Melbourne-Victory.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, thanks for joining Wikipedia! I notice that all your edits are on the topics of the LaManna Group and its CEO, and I wonder if you have some connection with them. This isn't necessarily a problem, but if you do you should file disclosure explaining any conflict of interest to ensure transparency. That's a link on how to do it and here's an example of what a disclosure looks like - but let me know if you have any kind of questions about this. Blythwood (talk) 22:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LaManna Group

Hello Maria Vampatella,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged LaManna Group for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 22:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SwisterTwister talk 22:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Maria Vampatella. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Anthony Di Pietro, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Ms. Vampatella, I want to be very clear to you. It seems obvious from your edits on here that your purpose in editing Wikipedia is to do public relations work on behalf of Anthony Di Pietro and his business interests. Your next edit to Wikipedia must be a formal disclosure of any conflicts of interest you have and companies paying you for your work, or some other response to this issue, or you are likely to be blocked from making further edits. Blythwood (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Maria Vampatella/LaManna Group

Hello Maria Vampatella,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Maria Vampatella/LaManna Group for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 11:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 14:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Maria Vampatella (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17804 was submitted on Mar 17, 2017 02:59:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maria Vampatella (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Our company Robert Masters and Associates (RMA) work for LaMannaPremier Group as their communication advisers. RMA is a public relations firm and is a paid contributor by LaMannaPremier Group. RMA has no conflict of interest working for LaMannaPremier Group or its CEO, Anthony DiPietro. RMA only edits new information that comes to hand or any new photographs that require updating relating to LaMannaPremier Group and its CEO, Anthony DiPietro. RMA was unaware of any block because we do not go into the page unless we have to edit it. Now that we know we have to disclose any conflict of interest, which we do not have as already mentioned, we will know for any future work on behalf of other clients if they wish us to help them with WIKIPEDIA related work. In this instance, LaMannaPremier Group, its CEO, Anthony DiPietro and Robert Masters and Associates definitely has no conflict of interest. RMA would like to take this opportunity to apologise for any inconvenience caused because we are not specialized in updating WIKIPEDIA, but we are trying our best and learning as we go. Thank you for your patience.

Maria Vampatella (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So, you work for Anthony DiPietro's company, but you have no WP:Conflict of interest regarding him? That makes no sense at all. Working for someone is the very definition of the WP:Conflict of interest. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.