Marcus Antony
Welcome!
|
Wikipedia and copyright edit
Hello Marcus Antony, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Little Lambkins have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017 edit
Your addition to Little Lambkins has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I have proposed this page for deletion because it is overly broad and the label goes against consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics. However, I am happy you are interested in improving Wikipedia's comic articles. I encourage you look around the comic project talk page, style manual, and clean up list. If you have any questions or need help, please let me know on my talk page or ping me using the reply template. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
April 2017 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Reboot (fiction). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Marcus_Antony reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Marcus Antony. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jim Kowalczyk, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Jim Kowalczyk to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks,
Meatsgains (talk) 00:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
You wrote on my talk page about Draft:Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation: "You need to put more information and complete the page of Black Jaguar White Tiger to improve, the page should not be deleted, but need to be improved." That is not correct. I did not create the page and am not responsible for it. You created the page in article space with no references and with two empty sections. I moved the page to draft space to permit you to complete it, because it was a candidate for speedy deletion as an article about an organization that does not make a credible claim of significance. Please do not create sub-stubs and expect that experienced editors will do the work for you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation has a new comment edit
Nomination of Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017 edit
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Article for Deletion tags only inform a reader of the page that there is a discussion in process. Removing it won't disrupt or stop the discussion. If the page is not ready, you can ask that it be made into a wp:AfC draft. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Please realize that if you keep this up, you will probably be wp:blocked and you won't be able to edit Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation Jim1138 (talk) 04:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017 edit
This account has been blocked indefinitely, as you have been persistent in removing Articles for Deletion template from Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation, which is not permitted as you are directly involved with the article. Persistent addition of unsourced content is also a violation of our policy. Finally, at no point you should be personally attacking another editor, as you did in Special:Diff/816409331. To appeal this block, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Alex Shih (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Marcus, do you have reliable references that show the notability of the organization? Refusing to allow a deletion discussion without improving the article yourself and attacking other editors is not acceptable as you can see by this block. --NeilN talk to me 14:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://blackjaguarwhitetiger.org/about-us/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor 07:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Black Jaguar White Tiger Foundation page should not be deleted edit
The page of BJWT should not be deleted because is important, someone needs to recreate the page and put more descriptions and references, I'm unsatisfied because the page is deleted!
GRRRRRRR, the page of BJWT SHOULD NOT BE DELETED😡!!! edit
I'm UNSATISFIED because the page of Black Jaguar-White Tiger Foundation was deleted, the page should not be deleted because it is an important page. SOMEONE NEED TO RECREATE THE PAGE AGAIN, if the PAGE IS DELETED OTHER TIME, i will be ANGRY, GRRRRRRR. I DON'T WANT TO SEE PORTUEGUESE VERSION OF THE PAGE ON WIKIPEDIA.
Nomination of List of male supervillains for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of male supervillains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of male supervillains until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)