Welcome!

edit
Hello, Marcus1387! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 04:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (July 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Akevsharma were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 06:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Marcus1387! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 06:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (July 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 01:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (October 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Most of the sources used are either not reliable, not independent or only brief mentions. Nothing suggests Corbell meets the notability guidelines.
S0091 (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Preston Corbell

edit

  Hello, Marcus1387. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Preston Corbell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Preston Corbell

edit
 

Hello, Marcus1387. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Preston Corbell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 00:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Preston Corbell. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can you please provide evidence that the previous reference was promotional with no editorial oversight? Marcus1387 (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The source exists in countless articles on this forum Marcus1387 (talk) 01:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Which one? I've had to remove a dozen or so blogs, user-generated fan pages, scrapers, brand paid placements/advertorials, and straight-up SEO/blackhat fake dumps. You've also hit the spam blacklist for others that prevented you from adding them. Sam Kuru (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell has been accepted

edit
 
Preston Corbell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Preston Corbell for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preston Corbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston Corbell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, very sorry to be blunt but this is absurd! You cannot in a one-minute time span ACCEPT a page and nominate it for DELETION. This is wrong. Please ponder the impact of your contradictory decisions on the page creator. At least, apologies would seem appropriate. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Preston Corbell (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please see my comment on the draft talk page about the sourcing.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 22:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply