User talk:MarcGarver/Archive 36
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |
Please comment on Talk:Australian Flag Society
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Australian Flag Society. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pioneer Village station
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pioneer Village station. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Foursquare
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foursquare. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ligand Pharmaceuticals
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ligand Pharmaceuticals. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Monsanto
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Taiwan stations). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sephora
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sephora. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Please comment on Talk:Regional power
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Regional power. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Boeing
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boeing. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Chick-fil-A
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chick-fil-A. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, QuiteUnusual. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Six years! |
---|
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Annandale Distillery
In reference to this. "Hello, I'm QuiteUnusual. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Annandale distillery seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)"
I am the social media specialist for the above company and am trying to update our Wikipedia page as a lot has changed since its last up date including what was deleted by yourself. Which was our historic first release. A very rare thing to happen. They were direct references from our website which I was still in the middle of editing. The opinions written in the aricle that was posted by my self were tasting reviews by independant whisky master tasters as featured on our site, and also further information on our inaugural release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.weild (talk • contribs) 13:46, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- @S.weild: Please read WP:PAID. You are required to declare your association with the company and strongly encouraged NOT to edit the page. Pasting advertising material onto the page is never acceptable regardless. QuiteUnusual (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- @QuiteUnusual: Thanks for the info Re. employee procedure. The page is heavily out of date and about 60-70% inaccurate, so i've been tasked to edit accordingly if possible. People are finding the distillery through Wiki regardless of the inaccuracies on there. I just need to make sure they're edited accordingly. Historical bottlings would normally be considered important, but i'll withhold further detail of them as they're already mentioned on the page. Best Regards.
Kwahu
Dear QuiteUnusual,
I'm new to Wikipedia Editing as you may have noticed and not familiar with many of the "technical" tools. Further, I'm not an IT Guru like you with the programming skills to be able to wipe out people's creative efforts in seconds. I write to protest your actions!
I'm native-born and have excellent knowledge of the subject. There's nothing I added that's untrue, controversial or biased. Also, the content I add is fully discussed with fellow natives and non-natives alike prior to entry. If for some "technical" reasons or unfamiliar editing jargon you decide to clear 24 bytes of a contributor's intellectual (hard) work, I sincerely believe you have done a great disservice. You could have contacted me with a helping hand! May I know your specific reasons for taking out some of my material and your constructive suggestions on how to correct whatever you find incorrect?
Regarding my sources and references, I have made a list of insertions that I plan to fit once my writing is done. If that is part of the problem, then you could rest assured it will be fixed.
I dont know IF this is the right way to contact you. I struggled to find a reply path by clicking on your username but found nothing helpful.
I would appreciate if you get back to me post haste so we figure how best the matter can be resolved.
Best regards
Kwahu the Native American Kwahu the Native American (talk) 03:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- There are a number of articles, linked in the message I left you, that will help explain in detail how to write in the correct style for Wikipedia and how to reference your work. To take one example, content such as "The success of their commercial ventures in major cities across Ghana and Accra in particular can be attributed to their excellent coping skills and thrift." is subjective, unsupported by a reference and expresses a non-neutral view ("excellent" is a matter of opinion). I suggest you read the help guides and policies, like WP:NPOV, and work from there. It is best to include the reference when you add the content as this will both ensure it is properly linked to the right content (i.e., so you don't forget where to put it) and prevent other editors removing your unreferenced content QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:13, 25 January 2019 (UTC)