User talk:Maplestrip/Archive 5

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maplestrip. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Thoughts and suggestion please

Hey Maple, I hope you're doing good! :) Could you check Homura's talk page, please? Would like to have some advice from you! :) NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Maplestrip, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 13:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello Maplestrip: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Your GA nomination of Girlamatic

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Girlamatic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tapastic icon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tapastic icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joey Manley

The article Joey Manley you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joey Manley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Thing Explainer cover.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Girlamatic

The article Girlamatic you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Girlamatic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hey ~ I read your commentary on the recent signpost article which was nominated for deletion-- I really respect the way you spoke up!

Just Like Glass (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@Just Like Glass: So cute > u < — Thanks, I appreciate the appreciation. I'm glad my comment came across well. I was really just lucky to come in before the crowd! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 06:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Webcomics

Portal:Webcomics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Webcomics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Webcomics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Apologies

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Webcomics recently closed as delete. The closing admin did not elaborate on his reasons for deleting, so I can't expect what did the portal in at the end of the day. It's a real bad let down. (As you probably already know, but I feel the need to restate anyways) The only outlet to continue forward would be to first discuss with the admin and possibly a deletion review failing that. Should we just give up on it? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, @MJL:. Yeah, I do feel really bad about it, but I don't think it's really worth trying to safe it at this point. It has always been a passion project of mine and it has mostly served to keep me thinking about webcomics in different ways, give me article ideas, motivate me to get articles to a higher quality, etc, as well as a form of pride in my favorite medium, I guess. I don't think it's worth the effort of other editors to reinstate it (even if it wasn't worth the effort to nominate it for deletion in the first place :/ ). If you want, you can put it up for a deletion review, and I would of course gladly give comments in its favor. But I don't want to waste anyone's time. I don't know if it is a lot of work to reinstate all those sub-pages that one has to use to get a portal to work, so that's definitely something I'm worried about. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Hmmm... Honestly I think we should still try do something. If I was as established as an editor as you, then I probably would have written the deletion review already. I'm just too drama prone for it to be anything meaningful coming from me. Maybe we should ask the working group what they think? By the way, according to your userpage you go by they/them pronouns. However, if I use the gender magic words, it currently looks like so: {{gender:Maplestrip|he/him/his|she/her/hers|they/them/their}} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

I only mention that the pronoun thing to ask which is preferred? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@MJL: The webcomic workgroup is basically just Oornery and I. It is not a particularly active community. If we want to reach a bigger audience, we should contact WikiProject Comics and see if anyone on there cares. I'm impressed that you think I'm less drama-prone than you, though. I feel like way too many of my articles have been deleted over the years. The deletion of portal actually made me decide to take a long break from the website, though I still keep track of my notifications as you can see. As for my gender, feel free to use both masculine and feminine pronouns; it doesn't matter much to me at all. I'm not the biggest fan of the singular they for myself, actually, and just have it on my userpage because I do consider it standard English grammar. Sorry for the confusement ^_^; ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 18:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

(Thank you for the pings btw) Well, let's make the working group bigger! Individuals like Acori may want to join and such. Also, Maple, you have over 12,000 mainspace edits which accounts for 63.6% of your total contributions. If there was any evidence you were prone to drama, then I am not seeing it. I checked your talk page history and everything. I can say with confidence however, that I have read articles you have created countless times before ever even interacting with you. You have to give yourself a little more credit here. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@MJL: Ok, I really do appreciate that peptalk. I'll look into the deletion review process tomorrow and see if it's even possible for a portal. Thanks, MJL. As for expanding the Webcomics Project in general, well, it does look like Acori is a Homestuck fan, so maybe there's an opportunity there? ^_^ ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 20:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@MJL: Thanks for the ping! I've been taking a semi-wikibreak lately due to generally low energy (I haven't even been doing the Traffic Report for the Signpost, which is a fairly big deal for me) but I would 100% be up for that working group when I'm feeling better! ♦AcoriSage 18:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Potential source

I found out that the 2008 edition of Comics and Sequential Art has a section on webcomics, so I got scans of the pages discussing them (and digital art) in case it proves useful: [1] Oornery (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@Oornery: Oh wow, Oornery, this is really cool! The images alone are just really cool to see. Definitely downloading these pages. Thank you a lot :) ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 10:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

I also have it as a PDF, if you'd prefer that. I just wasn't sure how to share a PDF.
Come to think of it, maybe we should have some kind of shared folder where we (and anyone else interested in helping with webcomics) can share/organize sources we find? I'm not sure how such a thing might work. Oornery (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

@Oornery: I can set up a Google Drive for that, if you want! I have tons of webcomics-related sources, both Wikipedia-reliable and unreliable. Here's at least a link you can use to view a lot of the digital materials I have for general-purpose research: [2]. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Nice! And I definitely would have some things to share. In related news, it looks like the 2008 ed. of Graphic Storytelling and Visual Narrative also has some stuff to say about webcomics, so I'm gonna try and get a hold of that. Also, I found a couple sources discussing the distinction between webcomics and digital comics, don't think we had any of those yet: [3] page 85, [4] Oornery (talk) 23:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

@Oornery: Awesome stuff! I added these two to the Drive, and I may look into how to apply these to our article on digital comics in particular. I'd love to give you editing rights on this Drive folder as well. Do you have a Google account? ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:14, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Quotative like

Draft:Quotative like, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Quotative like and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Quotative like during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. StudiesWorld (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Garnet - Steven Universe.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Garnet - Steven Universe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi Maple! How are you? :) I just want to have your opinion on Sayaka Miki's and Homura Akemi's article. I have left a message on their talk page. Check them. Please be honest and tell me what you think of both article! Thank you and sorry for bothering! NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi NotEnglishSpeaker, I'm doing well! I am not very active right now, and don't really have the time or energy to help you with these two articles. They do look very good, though, so very nice work! You can ask the same question on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. There should be many people there who write a lot more about anime characters than I do. If you have a specific question, I am always available :) - Keep it up! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Oh I see, alright, I'll ask them once I'm done with the articles. Thank you very much! I have a question tho, do you think I can nominate both articles to GA status or...? NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

NotEnglishSpeaker (talk · contribs), just skimming the article, looking mostly at structure and not much at content, these two articles look like they could be GA-quality, yes. Once you feel fairly confident, you can definitely nominate them and see what happens :) ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thank you very much for helping me! :) NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 21:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Tales

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Modern Tales you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MJL -- MJL (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Tales

The article Modern Tales you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Modern Tales for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MJL -- MJL (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I think the work you've done on pro gaming, and the Video gaming in X articles are really interesting. I think you're an important part of the VG project and value your work. TarkusABtalk/contrib 20:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

@TarkusAB: Thank you for the barnstar, it's always such a great feeling to receive one! It has been quite a while since I've actually worked on any video gaming articles, so I may need to get back to those Video gaming in X articles sometime. Either way though, I am really glad the articles I have made are appreciated! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Regarding "Dramatis personae of the Schlockiverse"

I linked that wiki page because it's the official wiki for the Schlock Mercenary comic. It was created and is run by Howard Tayler, the author of the comic. You can't get more official than that. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Tales

The article Modern Tales you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Modern Tales for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MJL -- MJL (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haruhi Fujioka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haruhi Fujioka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi Maple, sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you could you weight in in this move discussion. I ask you because I think this is in a similar situation to the Mother article that you voted on a few years ago. Alt (talk) 09:36, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@AlternateRT: This topic does interest me and I have opinions! Thanks for linking it to me. I do expect I'm coming in too late to have an impact. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

"Chance (gaming)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chance (gaming). Since you had some involvement with the Chance (gaming) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fighting game community, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Opinion needed!

Hello Maple! How are you doing? I don't know if you're still following the Madoka characters page, but can I have your opinion on Kyoko Sakura, if you have time? Do you think it's ready for GA nomination? Also the article already has been copyedited but can you take a look at the prose? NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

@NotEnglishSpeak: The article looks good! I copyedited a little but the prose looks very nice. Haven't checked the sources at all. You might want to write something about the Magia Record anime series, in which she also appears. Besides that, I think the article is pretty much ready for a Good Article nomination. Good luck, NotEnglishSpeak, you are doing great! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Wow, thank you very much! Now I feel very confident to nominate the article thanks to you. About the Magia Record anime series, should I create a subsection for it or just write it under Other media section? NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I think it can go under Other media. It is a spin-off rather than a continuation of the original, I do feel. You can probably rewrite and expand the existing content about the Magia Record mobile game. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 14:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much! :) NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Btw, I'm still not done with Homura Akemi's article, but what do you think of it? It looks kind of messed up. xD NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Just skimming it – I don't have the energy to copyedit it – I really like what it looks like. The size of the "Creation and development" and "Cultural impact" sections makes me very happy. I expect it can probably use a bit of trimming, but I really like what I see. Everything looks nicely sectioned off. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 12:49, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! I still need to work on "Design" section. As for Kyoko, I think I'll nominate her to GAN next week. NotEnglishSpeaker (talk) 14:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madeline (Celeste), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Haruhi Fujioka

Hello. The sentence that you eliminated was an accurate one. The one you wish to have stay in place is an opinion lacking citation. As someone who is gender-ambivalent, myself, I have long admired this character. However, being gender-ambivalent is not the same as being gender-fluid. Haruhi Fujioka has long been recognized to be gender-ambivalent, but has never been acknowledged by Bisco Hatori or anyone affiliated with the production of the manga or anime, to be genderqueer. As such, this trait cannot be ascribed to the character in an official article. However, if you wish this opinion to be listed, please put it in the proper segment of "Reception" along with its citation and full quotation. I'm sure you will agree that this is the correct way to proceed. If not, please communicate your reasons and make a suggestion for compromise on the article's wording. Yours in good faith. Ouranista (talk) 19:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Ouranista:. Sorry that we seem to be clashing here, I do hope we can come to a compromise we both prefer. For the lead/introduction section, it is normal to have a summary of body of the article. It's true that neither the terms "fluid gender" or "down-to-earth personality" are mentioned in reception. Maybe something like "queer gender" or using the quote "blasé approach to gender roles" would be more neutral for the lead section? I would like to have some of the reception in the lead section. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

I would like to avoid the phrasing female "biologically speaking" if possible, which I guess is why I reverted a bit more then I should have. I have a hard time considering alternative ways to phrase things, though maybe we can figure something out? I am not sure what purpose the changes you made in that section had, which made it difficult for me to figure out how to change it in a way I was comfortable with too. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for chatting with me about this. I'll address your last point first. My intention in trying to offer "biologically speaking" as an option was a way to offer a straight-forward description of a character without using "labels" or "descriptors" that do not have pertinence to the plot. Haruhi's case is ambiguous, much like herself. Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not offer the biological description as a choice (which I think it should), so I had to recant. Adding "citation needed" felt confrontational and didn't address the issue, either, so I also felt stymied. Coming back to the page now, otoh, I think the sentence you reverted saying: Having a "low perception of gender", Haruhi is able to join the club, keeping her sex secret from the club's clientele. (with citation) -- is fine.

It's the final sentence of the Intro paragraph that I feel, if included, must be worded according to WP:NPOV if the article is to portray Bisco Hatori's character as intended. As evidence, I point to the 2019 AnimeExpo in Los Angeles, CA, during which Hatori-sama appeared. While speaking at a live panel, she refused to clarify Haruhi's gender identity, saying that she wants the anime/manga to celebrate all gender identities. I was personally heartened by the inclusiveness of the attitude and believe that attitude is also a part of Haruhi Fujioka's character. This is why I believe gender-blind or gender ambivalent describes Haruhi most accurately and might end the back-and-forth editing that afflicts the page. May I suggest that the final sentence of the Intro paragraph read: Haruhi's character was positively received, both because of her down-to-earth personality and her "gender-blind attitude" towards life. No citation would be necessary, though having one might reduce further tampering. What do you think? Ouranista (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

I've not seen that panel, but that sounds lovely! I will look it up if If I can. Yes, your proposed change sounds perfect to me. "Gender-blind attitude towards life" describes the character well and matches the reception section perfectly. And... seriously, I'm sorry. I got territorial over this article, which obviously is not something I should do. Your edits are not bad at all and I'm glad you love Haruhi as much as I do, if not moreso. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 19:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

No worries. I've been guilty of becoming territorial at times, too. It happens to us all, I think. I'm glad we agree on the wording and will edit the page now (if you did not). Take Care. Ouranista (talk) 14:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wormworld Saga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page App (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Webcomics Nation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Webcomics Nation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Morgan695 -- Morgan695 (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of KPS 9566

Hello! Your submission of KPS 9566 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for KPS 9566

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Webcomics Nation

The article Webcomics Nation you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Webcomics Nation for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Morgan695 -- Morgan695 (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Super Mario speedrunning records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Super Mario speedrunning records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Super Mario speedrunning records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 14:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of The Legend of Zelda speedrunning records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Legend of Zelda speedrunning records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Legend of Zelda speedrunning records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 14:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agents of the Realm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cyanide and Happiness Show logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cyanide and Happiness Show logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)