Manualy20

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ManuelBot! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:38, Sunday, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

About your username...

Have you read the username policy? It's a bad idea to have a user name that ends in "Bot", because that's an indicator that an account is a software robot. It's probably a good idea if you change your username. —C.Fred (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Can't change username to Manuelly

C. Fred, please help me editing my username, 21:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

What part of the directions at WP:CHU are you having trouble with? —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

When I go to preferences, it does not let me to edit my username. Rob (talk) 21:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Which is not part of the directions. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I read the wikipedia page, now i'm gonna change my usernameRob (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC) And I requested to change my username now Rob (talk) 21:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

New York metropolitan area

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that moving popular pages with long-established titles, like the article New York metropolitan area, is not usually good practice. As such, I have moved the page back to its former title and started a page-move discussion on the talk page.

Also, you could ask for page protection at the following page: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Adding a protection template doesn't do anything unless an administrator actually sees your request and, if there is a reason, applies protection. epicgenius (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring report

Please do not attempt to add reports to the edit warring noticeboard until you understand what edit warring and the WP:3RR rule are. You don't report people there because they made a "rude" comment to someone. At this point, you need to move on. You're making a bigger deal out of the comment than it is. only (talk) 12:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

I agree with what only said. I'll go a step further and say that continuing to pester SMW about this one incident could start to look like harassment of them.

Frankly, it's a losing battle. I've seen people say far worth to other editors and maybe only get a minor warning or slapped with a trout. While we're supposed to all get along harmoniously, there's a point with the minor stuff where it's best just to shrug it off and keep going. If it's persistent or excessive, then that's something where an administrator will step in. (Personally, my line is when a person makes a comment about another person's gender, sexual preference, religion, or race—especially if it's a racial or sexual slur.) —C.Fred (talk) 14:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

And I just realized that comment was from October 2016. only (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

@Only, you're right. What should I do when someone says rude stuff, since Wikipedia is not for being obscene????Rob (talk) 00:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Request on 15:46:26, 9 August 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Manualy20

• Manualy20 (talk · contribs)
  • User:174.44.65.34 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Rob 15:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles for creation

Until you better understand Wikipedia, you should not be engaged in reviewing articles for creation. You've posted odd templates messages regarding articles to users but I don't think you understand the process. only (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC) Ok, Only. Understand. WOn't aimlessly accept submissions 16:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)\

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Question

You said "I am not new to Wikipedia". What account did you use before 3 days ago? Is it blocked? --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

No, This is my only account. And I am auto-confirmed and I have made over 100 edits. I have also joined 14 days ago. Rob 23:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Request for adminship

As has been pointed out to you, you have no chance of passing a request for adminship anytime in the next year or two. You do not have enough experience or compotence to be an administrator at this time. I highly suggest you place {{db-g7}} on the page to ask for deletion. Or tell me here you want it deleted and I'll do it. You need to step away from administrative aspects of Wikipedia for now and focus on editing and improving articles. only (talk) 01:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)i

\

Bull in a china shop

Sorry, through some combination of trolling and incompetence, all you're doing is making lots of work for other people. I've blocked this account indefinitely. Template with unblock info will be added in a second. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manualy20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not do disruptive editing anymore. Please unblock me because I want to edit pages needing additional references. Also, I am VERY sorry to such distruptive editing. 2 = I will not edit articles. I'm just gonna read them

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Alex Shih^Talk 18:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin may want to proactively remove talk page access; (1) they've been socking with an IP (User:174.44.65.34), and (2) they are clearly not competent to edit here; over 90% of their edits have had to be reviewed by others and reverted/removed/deleted. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

You do not need to be unblocked in order to read articles. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC) But I strongly promise i'm not going to do distruptive editing inginitely

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Manualy20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18973 was submitted on Aug 12, 2017 19:42:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Manualy20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18981 was submitted on Aug 13, 2017 16:26:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Manualy20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18982 was submitted on Aug 13, 2017 17:16:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bensonhurst Park concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bensonhurst Park, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bensonhurst Park concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bensonhurst Park, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bensonhurst Park (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bensonhurst Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bensonhurst Park, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)