Hello, Manowiki123, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Materialscientist (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Mahinda Rajapaksa was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Veyangoda Central college edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Veyangoda Central college, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vbmmv.sch.lk/index_files/Page390.htm. As a copyright violation, Veyangoda Central college appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Veyangoda Central college has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Moxy (talk) 18:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Avoiding copyright problems edit

Hello, and welcome. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Bandaranayake Central College, Veyangoda edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bandaranayake Central College, Veyangoda, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Bandaranayake Central College, Veyangoda, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Once the article had been deleted, re-creating the same article without addressing the issues that led to deletion was unconstructive. Using Wikipedia for promotion is contrary to policy, and copyright infringement is completely unacceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bandaranayake Central College, Veyangoda edit

Because Wikipedia is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, all of the content released under the same licence. As such, only the copyright holders to any text can licence it in this way. (It's a little complicated, but basically, anyone can re-use any content of Wikipedia, for anything they like, as long as they attribute the creator, and licence their creation the same way).

Presumably, the school you were copying text from owns the copyright to the text. If you write wholly new text, you can release it under the licence, and it could be included. If you want to work on a page without being disturbed by other editors, try writing at User:Manowiki123/Bandaranayake Central College, Veyangoda. Nobody should bother you there (unless you continue to use copyright material, which there's a strong no-tolerance for). Once you have an article that's written with a neutral point of view, and shows its notability through reliable sources, ask an administrator (such as me) to unlock the namespace and move the article over. If you have any questions, or need help, try the Help desk. Cheers, WilyD 15:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup at Bandaranayake_Central_College_-_Veyangoda edit

Greetings, thanks for your new article Bandaranayake_Central_College_-_Veyangoda! You got a lot of parts right, and a few things that needed some tweaking and improving. I've done a basic cleanup on it to bring it in line with Wikipedia standards.

I know it can be discouraging to have other editors change your work, but that's the entire nature of Wikipedia, to collaborate to improve. Though I don't know your school, I do know formatting, so I've done my best to bring your article into line. I've written an explanation of my edits here, which should clear up any questions: Talk:Bandaranayake_Central_College_-_Veyangoda.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for persistent copyright infringements. You have received five messages about this on this talk page, and you have still continued to add content to Wikipedia which you have copied from other sources. Unless a source has been licensed for re-use under the sort of very broad licensing terms required for publication in Wikipedia (see above), copying content from that source is illegal. Please do not continue to do this when the block expires, or you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. In addition, you have several times been warned about promotional editing. To help you understand this better, I am posting (below) a copy of a message that MatthewVanitas wrote at Talk:Bandaranayake Central College - Veyangoda, which has been deleted. Please read it and think about it. Matthew has gone to some trouble to write what seems to me to be a very helpful message. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Explanation for major edits edit

Greetings, I came upon this article because it was improperly placed in the Category:Sri Lanka; only 3-4 large overview articles should be directly in a main-country category, with the rest properly sub-categorised.

The article is interesting, and overall a useful addition, but it needed a good copyedit. As it stood, it was not written as a proper encyclopedia article, but more as fansite or FaceBook page. Wikipedia is a great place to share the basic history and official facts of a school, but not to discuss the photography club, tennis matches, and lists of favourite teachers. Individual people should only be mentioned if they are significant enough to have their own article; if not, what good does it do to a reader in Iceland or Japan to read that Mr Smith is the biology teacher?

The article suffered from other "FaceBook-like" issues such as use of attention-grabbing fonts and banners, and massive numbers of photographs, none of which are pertinent to a Wikipedia article. I have "hidden" your photos and anthem in the article so you don't lose the code (though note you can use the "History" tab to copy whatever you need from earlier versions if there's anything lost).

To continue improving the article, and to understand why some things have been removed, I strongly recommend you read Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Broadly speaking, before adding anything, think not of how excited it makes you, or how good an impression it would make at a student at a school down the street, but instead of how useful/informative the article would be to a stranger on the other side of the planet. Wikipedia articles should be pertinent to everybody, not just those intimate with the subject.

Thanks again for your work so far; though it can be disappointing that not everything you added is applicable, the greater part certainly is, and now the school has a page that's approaching proper format and style. Please be encouraged by this and work to bring it within guidelines, and feel free to contact me with any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:28, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Veyangoda Central College for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shirt58 (talk) 13:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply