Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Zealand Defence Force Military Police edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on New Zealand Defence Force Military Police requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AC325 (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal New Zealand Air Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 8 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal New Zealand Air Force, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Government and Labour Government. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Central Flying School RNZAF edit

Hi, I've reverted your edits to this article as the unit is still listed as being active on the RNZAF website [1], [2]. Could you please provide a reference which says its been disbanded? Thanks, Nick-D (talk) 22:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, This unit still appears active, with a news story reporting on it earlier this year. As such, I've reverted your changes stating that it was disbanded, and added that reference to the CFS article. Nick-D (talk) 23:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Three things edit

Hi, I'd like to raise three things with you:

  • First, and most importantly, I've noticed that on a few occasions you've repeatedly reverted the changes other people have made to your editing (for instance in the No. 41 Squadron RNZAF article and the RNZAF article). This is considered to be edit warring, and is impolite given that Wikipedia is based around consensus-based editing. When it is sustained it can lead to you being blocked from editing. Please start discussions on article talk pages when changes you made are reverted and you want to advocate for them.
  • Secondly, it's also considered good form to use edit summaries, especially when making lots of changes, though they're not compulsory. This helps other editors understand your changes.
  • Thirdly, please take the time to read the instructions for the military unit infobox at Template:Infobox military unit. The purpose of the allegiance field is "to indicate the allegiance of units which are not part of the regular armed forces of a sovereign state", and not to list the ceremonial links between British Commonwealth military units and the Queen. The use of non-essential images such as flags and ensigns in infoboxes is also discouraged (as this leads to visual clutter for no gain), and there's no need to say that the size of squadron-sized units is/was a squadron as this is obvious.

I appreciate that the learning curve for Wikipedia can be a bit steep, and I'd be happy to answer any questions you might have on the above. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

No. 3 Squadron RNZAF
added a link pointing to Wing Commander
No. 40 Squadron RNZAF
added a link pointing to Wing Commander
No. 5 Squadron RNZAF
added a link pointing to Wing Commander
No. 6 Squadron RNZAF
added a link pointing to Maori
Tim Wallis
added a link pointing to Blenheim
Warbirds over Wanaka
added a link pointing to Labour Government

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Royal New Zealand Air Force edit

 

Please do not add additional images to the Royal New Zealand Air Force article, as this leads to crowding the page. While the effort is appreciated we ask you to refrain from overloading the segments per WP:IMAGEMOS and try to keep the layout clean –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 06:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

No. 75 Squadron RNZAF
added links pointing to National Party and Labour Party
No. 3 Squadron RNZAF
added a link pointing to Maori

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No. 40 Squadron RNZAF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 40 Squadron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Royal New Zealand Air Force. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also, stop edit warring obviously incorrect uses of the Military unit infobox into articles. You will be reported, and be blocked, if this continues. I'd also encourage you to make use of article talk pages and edit summaries. Nick-D (talk) 08:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

For your reference, the documentation for the template is at Template:Infobox military unit. If you would like to suggest broadening the guidance, please start a discussion at Template talk:Infobox military unit or WT:MILHIST rather than your endless edit warring. Nick-D (talk) 08:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 04:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please take the time to read WP:CONSENSUS - Wikipedia works through consensus-based editing, and edit warring and the use of multiple accounts isn't going to get you anywhere. Please start discussions about your proposed changes when the block expires. Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No. 3 Squadron RNZAF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Central Flying School RNZAF. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recetly added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to No. 14 Squadron RNZAF. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recetly added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roddy Fulton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

NZDF colours edit

Hi, Could you please provide references establishing that the various units of the NZDF have official colours? I can't find anything on Google confirming this. Also, in case you have been conducting this editing using IP accounts and this account, please note that such conduct is strongly discouraged. Nick-D (talk) 10:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop edit warring this in without reference. As noted on my talk page, if RNAF units have official colours, please provide sources to support this. You have been blocked for this kind of edit warring previously, and please don't go down the same path. Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Manmountain08. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Manmountain08. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Rnzaf police crest with griffin and taiaha.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Rnzaf police crest with griffin and taiaha.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Rnzaf police mp patch.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Rnzaf police mp patch.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:RNZAF Police edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:RNZAF Police a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into RNZAF Police. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

RNZAF Police moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, RNZAF Police, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Rnzaf police crest with griffin and taiaha.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Rnzaf police crest with griffin and taiaha.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murray Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gallagher. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Royal New Zealand Air Force Police edit

 

Hello, Manmountain08. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal New Zealand Air Force Police".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 11:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 19 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warbirds over Wanaka, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 14 Squadron and 75 Squadron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crocodile Dundee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm MangoMan11. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Royal New Zealand Air Force, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MangoMan11 (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply