December 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Flooded with them hundreds that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 12:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Why some admin in Wikipedia trying protect fake my cultures on English international page ??

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cambodian New Year. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - give it up already, sock. Stop wasting everyone's time. Onel5969 TT me 13:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cambodian New Year, you may be blocked from editing. Onel5969 TT me 14:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Flooded with them hundreds 14:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • What edit war ? The fake article Cambodian New Year not full caption and write clear a bout my culture and How time for edit again and again ?

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cambodian New Year. Please stop wasting other editor's time. At some point today, an admin will block you as a sock of Phnom Penh Skyline. So why keep wasting other folks time? Onel5969 TT me 15:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply