Manishprivet

Manishprivet, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Manishprivet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manish Privet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manish Privet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Manishprivet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Peridon (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Writing about yourself

It's something that is strongly not recommended on Wikipedia. If you are editing things on the encyclopaedia, you can use your user page (as you have done) to tell us a bit about yourself, but don't put in links to your sites, or your phone number, or your email address. Those can be picked up by spammers and others up to no good. To have an article here, a person must pass WP:BIO, with reliable independent sources WP:RS to prove the notability. In WP:AUTOBIO it explains that you are best not to write about yourself. Being harmless is not a reason for an article to exist. Failing WP:COPYVIO is a very good reason for an article not to exist, but passing that policy is not a reason for an article to exist unless the notability policy is passed. The same applies to other policies - failing WP:SPAM is a reason for deletion, but passing it isn't a reason for keeping. It's like a set of AND gates in logic - to have an article, you must pass BIO and RS AND the article must pass COPYVIO AND SPAM. Some day, you might pass BIO AND RS. If you do, you'll probably find someone has written about you already. Peridon (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Manishprivet

A tag has been placed on User:Manishprivet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waggie (talk) 23:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aurora (Festival)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aurora (Festival), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

• Manishprivet, Ritchie333 is an administrator, and saved the article from speedy deletion by cutting the advertising content from it and removing the tag. In addition, whether or not you have permission to use the college's wording, copyvio is a very serious thing on Wikipedia and the article could be deleted for that reason, too. (In any case, using the same wording as the college itself does is the reason the article was written inappropriately for Wikipedia; articles here are encyclopedia entries, not promotion, so they need to be written neutrally and usually much more briefly than by the organization itself. Summarize it in your own words in neutral language and it will be much more acceptable. Reverting an admin who fixed the problems that caused the article to be tagged for speedy deletion was not wise, and you actually reinstated the tag! So I did a quick save by basically reverting to Ritchie's version.

I see above that you've been having problems with your work getting speedy deleted. One way to avoid this is to write briefly and neutrally as I say above. But you might also consider submitting articles via Articles for Creation, which is a process where you create the article as a draft (usually either in your "sandbox" or by typing Draft: before the title when you first create it) and experienced Wikipedians then advise you on how to make it acceptable; it becomes a "live" article visible to readers only when it's judged to be ready, which gives you the benefit of advice and makes it much less likely that someone will tag your work to be speedy deleted. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

• I give up. You have reinstated not only the offending text but the speedy deletion tag by blindly reverting. If you don't want to save this article, so be it. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Manishprivet/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Manishprivet/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 00:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

COI notice

Hello, Manishprivet. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Aurora (festival) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aurora (festival) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora (festival) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)