Mamoo.8562, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Mamoo.8562! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Islamia College Civil Lines edit

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Mamoo.8562, thanks for creating Islamia College Civil Lines!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease address te tagged issues: Remove all mentions of 'we'. Please also rerite in proper English appropriate for an encyclopedia. Add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:EDF4:356E:4D91:F8E4 (talk) 12:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamoo.8562 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know who is Eshal Fayyaz and why I was blocked. I never listened her name before. This is my personal account. And I cannot upload any photo because I uploaded my photo on my user page, I didn't know that was against rules, and now I cannot upload any photo. Now who is Awais Azad and Bbb23 who blocked me without any reason.

Decline reason:

There was an awful lot of spam coming from the accounts connected to yours in that sockpuppetry investigation. You will want to comment on that in your next unblock request. Huon (talk) 21:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamoo.8562 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only have a single account and no account is connected to my account. Could you please give me an example of the spam by me. I only created two pages, one for a village Template:Shadore and second for Template:Islamia College Civil Lines. These were not on wikipedia, so there is nothing spam.

Decline reason:

It is simply not the case that no other account is connected to this. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awais Azad/Archive where a substantial number of other accounts are connected. And then you go and say, "I uploaded my photo on my user page", which is simply not true. You are thinking of one of your other sockpuppet accounts. No, the block looks entirely legitimate. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamoo.8562 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"You are thinking of one of your other sockpuppet accounts", I told you I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER SOCKPUPPET ACCOUNT. You all are ____ .Now I am going to delete my account. I don't want to use wikipedia anymore.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Shadore for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply