Malliktajmahal

Welcome!

Hello, Malliktajmahal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like English to Telugu Dictionary, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Killiondude (talk) 07:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "English to Telugu Dictionary"

A page you created, English to Telugu Dictionary, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 07:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Pawan at vishwas bro marriage.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pawan at vishwas bro marriage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Commander _{(Ping Me)} 16:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Its not copyrighted I have took permission from the Concerned person. You can make your claim as usual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.245.88 (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Profile?uid=4289984491959691523 this link is vishwa profile link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.245.88 (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC) https://www.facebook.com/vishwa.bharath vishwa facebook profile. Its genuine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.245.88 (talk) 17:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pawan Kalyan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:40, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pawan Kalyan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

We take what the reliable sources say, because THATS WHAT WE DO BY POLICY. WP:V / WP:RS. If you have evidence that this particular story is wrong, then you will need to establish the error by providing reliable sources that make such a claim. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

You said media claims are Absolute. Its no where in policy mentioned that its absolute. Eenadu mews posts some news some politician. Did you take everything and keep them in Wikipedia. ? no Right. When you are putting some positive information then its fine to include news sources. When some putting some controversial information I can put up News organization made some false claims.

you need to show reliable sources have indicated this particular information is incorrect, not merely make unsupported conspiratorial claims that your hero is being attacked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

I am not saying he is attacked. You wrote that He has son and daughter with his second wife. there by its clear that you have wrong intentions towards him. May be Jealous Kind of. You may have written Her name Renu desai. It clearly proves that no positive information about the hero is posted here . If you are doing some good work here how can I oppose you. I didn't edit anything about his first wife. You have to observe that.

Misperceptions

Per your edit here you appear to have some misconceptions. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, edited by people who attempt to represent how the subject of the article is viewed by the experts in the field and most certainly NOT as the fans wish to portray their "hero". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

If Fans want to portray something they can fill all the achievements with wrong sources. We are not doing that right. What to call some one who portrays wrong information? only they need is some anti Media agencies...An "AntiFan"??? Think in a positive way. Don't always try to be negative when we are blessed with some good editing skills for wikipdia. you didn't seems to be adding any positive information here though. Mallik (talk) 07:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Plagiarism

You will be well served to quickly learn that plagiarism is not tolerated in any academic venue, and it's something that people lose their careers over because it is unethical. Unlike what you added here (which is clearly copied verbatim from here), content must be written from scratch in your own words, not copy/pasted from other sites. All prose content is considered copyrighted unless otherwise specified. Your first tip-off that the content was inappropriate for inclusion should have been the inappropriate tone. "Smashed opening day records" is not proper encyclopedic tone. Content at Wikipedia must be presented from a neutral point of view, not from the point of view of a gushing media analyst or promoter.

Additionally, please familiarize yourself with WP:MINOR and only mark edits as minor if they are cosmetic changes, like a typo fix, adding punctuation, or adding/removing wikilinks. This is not a minor change. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Manchi Manasulu (1986) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manchi Manasulu (1986). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC (talk) 04:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Okay thank you. I will work on it. Mallik (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)