March 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Harsha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 08:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello sir, I am Gomati Sharma. I notice you have reverted my edit on Pulakeshin II. His wife is Tarinidevi not damavati. For this please add source. Gomati Sharma (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please see WP:V and WP:RS as you have been told earlier - you need to cite a source when you add content to Wikipedia.
Also, please do not use multiple accounts to edit articles - see WP:SOCK. utcursch | talk 07:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Shravani Chatterjee per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shravani Chatterjee. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
ST47 (talk) 02:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply