September 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ateneo de Davao University, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good day! Yes. I based it from personal knowledge. But I guess you're right, admin. It should have a source. Thanks for the reminder! Stay safe.

  Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Imperial Japanese Army. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Edit said "grammar changes" when there were substantive uncited changes to the article. Thanks — motevets (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


Block

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Major General Ichiro Kimura (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello! I am requesting admins to please unblock me and consider my request. I am giving my realizations on why my block was very valid a few months back. First, I was violating WP rules on vandalism and disruptive editing and did not adhere to them. Second, I was very stubborn to the point that I would even have a fight with editors and admins for my violations. Third and lastly, I just did not want to read and adhere to the rules since I thought no one could make me stop from what I was doing. I know I was wrong. Please, admins, unblock me already. I have learned my lesson and 9 months of blocking is already enough to make me realize my mistakes in the past. I apologize for the behavior I have shown before. I promise I will be better from now on, an editor who follows guidelines and rules that constitute responsible and correct editing at WP. Thanks and hoping for your kind consideration. Major General Ichiro Kimura (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed sockpuppetry. WP:SO may be available if you are ever able to go at least six months with zero edits. Yamla (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.