Welcome! edit

Hello, Maj Zore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Uanfala (talk) 20:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mazonicism edit

I sympathise with the ideas in the article, but they don't really belong on wikipedia at this stage. A topic warrants having its own wikipedia article only if it has been covered by secondary sources (see WP:GNG). I've nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazonicism, you're welcome to participate there. I think you should instead try publishing your ideas in a blog or other media. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 20:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mazonicism - reply edit

Reply: Ye ye ye ye suuuure ehhh should I rather rename it to "Draft:Mazonicism" with an excuse that references will be added later? Anyone can make fake secondary sources and I n also and everyone does. Is that what you want me to do? I know the only thing to it is censoring me right?!? Like, Can I just reassign it to be a draft??? Well and if you say there is no secondary source covering this, let me introduce to you my discord group who will agree with me... They will confirm that talking about "mazonic/ACAM politics as a part of anarcho communism is a thing"... Other media is invisible... And you don't help by agreeing with what i wrote, you are just being kind ha ha.https://discord.gg/DKQwp3e It is a real ideology please stop trying to silence me... Ahhhhh- Now, IMR, will you leave it alone if I rename it to draft, and make a disclaimer at top that secondary sources are to be added?!? Because it is true i am the creator of this idea but you are acting the way as if one disabled Hawking from creating a wiki about his theories, it is just unnecessary to be so mean, but you aren't mean, you are only "following orders", but same excuse was used in nurnberg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maj Zore (talkcontribs) 21:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mazonicism edit

 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mazonicism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A11 - This page is entirely WP:OR and has been moved back to draft space twice. The second time shortly after being tagged for AfD to avoid deletion per the edit summary

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Orville1974 (talk) 21:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Draft:Mazonicism. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. You've inserted dubious links into this article three times. Please do not continue to insert spam links into the article. Orville1974 (talk) 22:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Maj Zore. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 23:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 23:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply