Mais2

Welcome!

Hello, Mais2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Thank you not only for your message, but for your work on the Renaissance article. Glad to have you here on Wikipedia. Have fun and happy editing, Antandrus (talk) 04:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Review of Renaissance

I just reviewed the your nominated article, and have listed a few issues that need to be addressed before GA status is achieved. Zeus1234 16:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I just passed the article. Zeus1234 16:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Italian Renaissance painting

Hi Mais! take a look at the above! ... You've probably already seen Renaissance architecture which I worked on extensively, along with Brosi who did the historiography and so on, having better access to a current library than I have. --Amandajm 13:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I've got heaps of books here, but not terribly current. I'm writing most of it off the top of my head and just checking on the dates. I'm alwyas quite pleased with myself when I look something up to check and yes it was the Baroncelli Chapel! I don't know if you know Santa Croce, but there is a great row of chapels painted by several different people and its hard not to muddle them, evry man and his dog had a chapel in Florence- the Medici chapel or two or three, the Pazzi chapel, the Rucellai chapel the Bardi chapel, the Peruzzi chapel and so on

Oh yes, and if you want to know who was painting in the 14th century, there was Bernardo Daddi, Gaddo Gaddi, Taddeo Gaddi and Angolo Gaddi, but Gaddo Gaddi was actually Daddy Gaddi and just to add to the confusion there was Agnolo Lorenzentti and Pietro Lorenzetti, Bartolo di Fredi and Taddeo di Bartolo. I don't know who Fredi was. Then there was Barna of Siena. just plain Barna. Not Barna di Fredi or Barna di Gaddi or even Barna di Bartolo. So reallly, one is thankful for the 15th and 16th centuries when people had distinctive names like Michelangelo and Raphael. --Amandajm 13:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I just noticed your planning to take on Edward the Black Prince. Hmmm! I had a go at that one and scuttled off fast. They don't like me over there. Someone suggested that Edward might have been a gentleman of colour, because his mother was described as being brown all over, with black eyes and a short broad nose. I supported the idea. Oh my goodness... the remains of the discussion is still there but some of it is missing. Good luck!

Not this article. I'll have to do one specially on the 14th century, which will require some research to keep them all sorted and locate the whereabouts of there works. There is this neat gallery near the Cathedral of Siena which has a stunning collection of that period. There was a Taddeo di Bartolo which was jsut stunning, because it was so expressive and had such beautiful litle details. Where are you located. I'm in the Land Downunder, so it's not easy to get to places. Are you at uni? What are you studying?

--Amandajm 14:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

So do you feel like writing a short paragraph on the philosophical, social state of Florence round about 1400, when it all kicked off? I'm still editting. You could write it in word and drop it in, or leave it on the talk page? --Amandajm 14:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I've put in the section headings for what I'm planning on doing. Gotta go to bed! Seeya!

--Amandajm 15:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi mais!

Thank you so much for your offer to fill in the references! I didn't read the discussion page until just now, which is really rather slack of me! I hope that I've got sufficient references to keep everybody happy, but if you would like to add more, please do. I've been having a bit of fun with part 2 Italian Renaissance painting, development of themes]. I really don't know what to do about referencing that. The paintings themselves provide the evidence for what is said about them. --Amandajm 01:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Mais!,

I've left a message on the discussion page of Italian Renaissance painting, development of themes] requesting suggestions for what it should be called. JNW suggests Italian Renaissance painting (themes). Maybe you'd like to give it some thought. Have you got time between assignments or whatever to go looking things up?... --Amandajm 12:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Renaissance lead

Yeia sou Mais! I have replied to your comments and would like to hear your thoughts at your convenience.You can reply at the article talk since I have it on watch.Thanks.Xenovatis (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Renaissance

Renaissance has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)