MainroomSHMainroom

Have we gotten First Avenue on the record about this? Nope. Show me where that is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcutie (talk • contribs) 22:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

See attached citation. MainroomSHMainroom (talk) 22:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Trolls keep wanting to pretend that anonymous allegations are 100% accurate. Where have they been proven? Where has what Racket has conjectured been explicitly discussed by First Avenue? You're not gonna find that because it doesn't exist. -Kingcutie. Kingcutie (talk) 22:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

You can't even spell his name correctly, pedant. Kingcutie (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Let's leave out of the image description, shall we? - Kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Try to write with economy. Your contributions are verbose and clunky. -kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 23:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

There's no need to mention what you're saying in an image description, when the text is right next to it in the body. Kingcutie (talk) 01:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

None of what's been anonymously alleged is sexual assault. - kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Racket is a not a "high-quality source, people. Kingcutie (talk) 01:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

"Former star" does the work. "Easy writing is vile, hard reading" - Sheridan (kingcutie) Kingcutie (talk) 01:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Would someone else intervene here? This is getting old. -kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Bitter, destructive trolls don't get the last word here. Because they heard some gossip, no matter how earnest they may be. Articles or not, none of this is proven, and this is now entering the realm of legitimate harassment. -kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Digital vandalism with an agenda. -kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Somebody should definitely intervene. As the subject's brother you and your 500+ edits of this page are showing an obvious bias towards burying what has been reported regarding Sean's sexual assault allegations, and how this community has reacted to those sexual assault allegations. MainroomSHMainroom (talk) 15:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Why are you so insistent on preaching allegations as "facts!" What's your dog in this race? -kingcutie Kingcutie (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

I am insistent on making sure that the allegations are visible and clearly presented as allegations, not as fact. We both know your dog in this race, being his brother and all.

Digital vandalism with an agenda indeed, right Patrick? MainroomSHMainroom (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

You still can't even manage to spell his name write, Batman. You know who I am. Who are you? And why is advancing this narrative your cause, crusader? Kingcutie (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Picture removed. Fixed it. Kingcutie (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

No reference of the star. Fixed it. Kingcutie (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Why explain an epic backstory ... when it's apparently no longer gerrmaine? Kingcutie (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Har Mar Superstar

There is currently a discussion about how to include this material which you may want to participate. Not that you have done anything wrong, but please also note Wikipedia's edit warring policy; essentially, avoid restoring edits which were reverted. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Har Mar Superstar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi.

I provided citations to reliable sources. MainroomSHMainroom (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Har Mar Superstar

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Har Mar Superstar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Your recent editing history at Har Mar Superstar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 19:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)