Speedy deletion nomination of Woody pak

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Woody pak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody Pak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 09:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Information is similar to prior article because it is verifiable. New article demonstrates notability with BMI award, a fact not present at the time of past article. Mahalos (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Woody Pak

edit

  Hello, Mahalos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woody Pak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Woody Pak

edit
 

Hello, Mahalos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woody Pak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mahalos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello,
The 2nd source I see was not cited correctly and led to the 404 page. It is here and should be verifiable. https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Telly-Leung-Will-Star-in-Stage-Adaptation-of-Oscar-Nominated-Film-THE-WEDDING-BANQUET-20240415
There is a tertiary source here: https://playbill.com/article/the-wedding-banquet-musical-to-world-premiere-in-august-com-114256
I will add to the sandbox to make these changes. Thanks for your patience. Please let me know if the changes were ok. Mahalos (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your quick review. I am confused as I see other Wikipedia articles that have been up for years of comparable composers such as George Shaw (composer) whose citations are of his own website and many other websites which no longer have an archive or don't exist as verifiable sources. Also many references are to his own bandcamp site!
I'll keep looking for articles that speak more extensively about Woody Pak. Thank you for your patience. One quick question - does the "inline" minimum citation refer to the 3 that are bunched up together? Mahalos (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I also saw that the current Drafts is a really old one and may not reflect the latest things I thought I was updating. So I revised what is currently in Drafts with the latest sandbox work which should comply better with Wiki standards. Thank you Mahalos (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woody Pak 2 (August 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply