User talk:Magiciandude/RecordReport
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Magiciandude in topic Subscribers
Subscribers edit
I think the subcribers thing should be explained as a comparison for Billboard: for example. "On a similar manner to American magazine Billboard's charts, some positions can be retrieved without the need of a subscription, whilst the complete list of songs is only available for subscribers." What do you think? --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 05:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to make any changes as you please on the main article. As long as the methodology has been explained, I'm fine with anything you put down on the article. Maybe even make some corrections if I made any errors. Cheers! Erick (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- We have a big problem. The charts from venezuela.national-report.com contains data from Venezuela, not Colombia. Data from colombia is at www.national-report.com. The main issue is that the data provided by National-Report is not similar to the data provided by Record Report, mainly because they monitor different radio stations. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's pretty similar of what happens between Monitor Latino and Billboard Mexico. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well, isn't the methodology to how they rank their charts what really matters? I mean, if that's how they utilize charts in Venezuela, it must the same for Colombia. After all, it is the same company. If you say it's like Monitor Latino and Billboard International, then it's not a big deal. Kww told me at WT:Charts when I asked about the different Mexican charts, he said "It's quite possible for two separate airplay charts to exist for the same country and give different answers based on sampling differences." Unless there is something else I missing. Erick (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not talking about the metholology. The method is fine. What i'm saying is that chart info on venezuela.national-report.com might be used on charts for Venezuela and www.national-report.com for Colombia when adding positions to articles. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:20, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe i exagerated with "big problem" >.< --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- I still don't think it's something to be concerned. I probably won't use the Venezuelan from National-Report charts myself, but I don't think it's a big deal if a editor decides to use Venezuelan charts from National-Report and Record Report at the same time on the same article. I highly doubt it will be a recurrent occurrence since the Latin charts aren't even that well-known. Erick (talk) 06:27, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well, isn't the methodology to how they rank their charts what really matters? I mean, if that's how they utilize charts in Venezuela, it must the same for Colombia. After all, it is the same company. If you say it's like Monitor Latino and Billboard International, then it's not a big deal. Kww told me at WT:Charts when I asked about the different Mexican charts, he said "It's quite possible for two separate airplay charts to exist for the same country and give different answers based on sampling differences." Unless there is something else I missing. Erick (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's pretty similar of what happens between Monitor Latino and Billboard Mexico. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- We have a big problem. The charts from venezuela.national-report.com contains data from Venezuela, not Colombia. Data from colombia is at www.national-report.com. The main issue is that the data provided by National-Report is not similar to the data provided by Record Report, mainly because they monitor different radio stations. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 06:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)