User talk:Maestroka/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Maestroka. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Kingdom Robertea, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Nareklm 15:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia!! I hope that you will enjoy your time here. I was thinking that maybe you would like to get involved with Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey - we need all the help that we can get. There you can also find and contact users who are trying to improve Turkey-related articles. Just add your name to the participants list. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Happy editing! Baristarim 20:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Someone nominated an article you created, RC Quarterly, for deletion. Follow the links in the article for more information. Cheers Baristarim 21:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
robert college - kingdom robertea
merhaba. kingdom robertea'lı bir robert kolej'li olarak (ne şans ama!) size yardım etmekten zevk duyarım. beraber robert kolej'le alakalı birçok sayfayı da geliştirebiliriz. ayrıca bazı 'güncel' bilgileri de size sağlayabilirim. aslında vikipedi'ye çeviri, vs. yaparak geliştirmeye çalışıyorum ama burda da katkıda bulunmaya hazırım...hemen irtibata geçin benimle lütfen--Quinlan Vos 15:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- aslında benim de çok fazla boş vaktim var diyemem ama rc article'ının eski halinde olması baya kötü, kesinlikle genişletilmesi gerekiyordu...teşekkürler o yüzden yaptığınız çalışmalar için. vakit bulduğumda bir after-school'da çeşitli resimler çekebilirim tabi...okul dergilerinin de articlelarının olmadığını anlayabiliyorum. çok da sorun değil bence. article içeriği geliştirilip robert college article'ına da koyulabilir. zaten yeterince uzunlukta olunca 'inclusion principle'ı da aşabiliyor biliyorsunuz bazı şeyler...sc, vs. şeyler için kaynak sorunum olabilir ancak resim konusunda yardım etmeye çalışacağım...--Quinlan Vos 00:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:
Sorry I don't read or write in Armenian. Artaxiad 22:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Robert College
I will have a look at the article. Thanks. Chapultepec 10:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your call. Congratulations for making great improvements to the Robert College article. Peer reviewing is a detailed work that must done very carefully. Thus, I will have a look at the article as soon as possible, when I have enough time (probably in a few days). Btw, Robert mezunu ya da öğrencisi misiniz? --Kalkim 13:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation - I'm in the process of moving between countries this week so I can't do it. Sorry! Aelfthrytha 03:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation. I have tried to provide a detailed peer-review. I think the subject has FA potential. Good luck! Regards, --Free smyrnan 06:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Also, pls take a look at the GA issues, which should be much simpler/faster to resolve so it can be moved to GA first before starting FA work. --Free smyrnan 09:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. --Free smyrnan 14:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am an RC graduate, too (to be specific: RC'04). Nice to meet you --Kalkim 18:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- memnun oldum tekrar:) cidden bravo, Robert Collegeın GA almasını sağladın.. arada bu kaynak güzelmiş.. kolay gelsin.. ----Kalkim 15:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Requesting you to remove
I don't care of what you think of what happened in 1915, your thoughts are your thoughts. But I request to removes this sentence from your user page. :* This user is against the Armenian Diaspora's efforts to rewrite the twentieth century history. It is provocative, prejudicial. Your thoughts don't give you the right to make such generalisations on your userpage for everyone to read. Fad (ix) 05:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Robert College
Hi!
Firts of all, thank you for your message :) Yes it's right Hungarian grammar has some things common with Turkish. About Robert College, I'm quite busy these days but I will try to translate the article into Hungarian. My main goal is to improve the Atatürk article in both wikis but never had the time so far because of my new job. K.i.b ;) --Teemeah Gül Bahçesi 10:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Ataturk
Whether or not he wanted to be called a Muslim politican, he was in fact a politican who was Muslim. Thus the category should stay. Wikipedia is for facts, not what the subjects of articles wanted to be called --AW 19:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Just curious
But how can you mourn Hrant Dink and deny the Armenian Genocide at the exact same time? Are you aware that Hrant Dink was for recognition of the Genocide by the Turkish state? -- Aivazovsky 15:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI, on WP:ANI
For your information, your username has come up here. -- tariqabjotu 04:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Maestroka,
What do you hope to accomplish by including these comments on your user page? Keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, see also the username policy which bars polemical statements. To follow these guidelines will help you in several ways. First, it will spare you from pointless controversy. Second, it will promote a collegial relationship with editors with whom you may strongly disagree, but must deal with with anyhow. Third, it will encourage others who might have opposing biases to step down from their own soapboxes. If Wikipedia is not to be a battleground - and it really shouldn't be - then it falls to us to examine our behavior and adjust it accordingly.Proabivouac 21:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
I have absolutely no idea how that happened. My intent was to change one word and have no idea how all that stuff got blanked. I'm mortified.--Mantanmoreland 12:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
... and you had every right to be upset! --Mantanmoreland 13:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)