Please do not move hordes of pages without consensus. We use "Argentine" as demonym in English Wikipedia. -- Alexf(talk) 00:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Human shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 13:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Madere reported by User:Dbrodbeck (Result: ). Thank you. Dbrodbeck (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Alexf(talk) 22:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Human

edit

REturning from a block and returning to the same edit-war that got you blocked in the first place is highly inadvisable. I suggest you take note of the multiple contributors who have restored the consensus version, before you get blocked again - your next block is likely to be more substantial. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Chaturbate

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Chaturbate, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. Your account might have been hijacked or hacked in order to use it for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jesse Viviano (talk) 04:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply