Welcome!

edit

Hello, MadCarrot01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quwegga Project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Wracking talk! 00:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Quwegga Project

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Quwegga Project, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wracking talk! 00:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 00:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please... unblock me... i have important information and i regret any wrongdoing i did... please...

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks.

--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I vandalized an article by changing every "Quagga" to "Quwegga". Originally, I thought this was the correct spelling because all my life everyone I had spoken to on my favourite animal had called it a Quwegga (pronounced the same as Quagga). However, I told my friends what I was doing and they encouraged me to make a fairly offensive article correlating to Quwegga. I regret making this article, however I believe I was in the right originally. Albeit just uninformed. I have no desire to make edits similar, sticking until minor edits until I'm confident in my research. But my main focus if I get unblocked will be to make an article on a fairly underground artist called "Acidgvrl". I have done extensive research on this artist and feel very confident in my ability to write a reliable article to help Wikipedians who are interested.

Decline reason:

That you still think you were in the right shows you need to remain blocked. You don't yet understand how Wikipedia works. Hint: we have a specific policy that you must adhere to which would have prevented your misinformed understanding from having an effect here. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please read my previous unblock request to understand why I wish to be unblocked, this is just to clear things up and respond to the admins response to my request. I need to specify that *at the time* I felt I was in the right (I chose the wrong grammar to explain this, and honestly didn't need to explain it at all). Since then I have learned what I did wrong and read many of the helpful pages on making successful edits and ensuring that mistake doesn't get repeated. If there is anything else I need to do to be unblocked that I have missed just tell me. Thanks a lot.

Decline reason:

It's not enough for you to just tell us that you understand- many people do this and then go right back to doing the same thing wrong. You need to demonstrate your understanding to us by doing as Yamla already asked you- to tell us the specific policy that, had you adhered to it, would have prevented your activities. Yes, this is a test. If you need time to locate that policy, that's fine- there is no deadline for requesting unblock. You can take all the time you need. 331dot (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MadCarrot01 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hey, I believe I found the policy at WP:VD. Specifically "Blanking, Illegitimate" when I replaced all the words in a specific article with a word that sounded similar, but was nonsense. Also "Page creation, Illegitimate" when I made a new page and put malicious or offensive content on it. This was all done to the "Quagga" page due to an inside joke I have with my friend group. I also created the "Quwegga Project", which was encouraged by said friends, but was executed by me nonetheless. If there was another policy an admin for me to read and review then please just let me know. I'm not sure how to prove that I will never vandalize again, but my main purpose for unblocking my account is purely to create a new article (after ensuring I feel ready and it will be up to the Wikipedia standard) to share knowledge on a band I enjoy. Thanks a lot.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hey, I believe I found the policy at WP:VD. Specifically "Blanking, Illegitimate" when I replaced all the words in a specific article with a word that sounded similar, but was nonsense. Also "Page creation, Illegitimate" when I made a new page and put malicious or offensive content on it. This was all done to the "Quagga" page due to an inside joke I have with my friend group. I also created the "Quwegga Project", which was encouraged by said friends, but was executed by me nonetheless. If there was another policy an admin for me to read and review then please just let me know. I'm not sure how to prove that I will never vandalize again, but my main purpose for unblocking my account is purely to create a new article (after ensuring I feel ready and it will be up to the Wikipedia standard) to share knowledge on a band I enjoy. Thanks a lot. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, I believe I found the policy at WP:VD. Specifically "Blanking, Illegitimate" when I replaced all the words in a specific article with a word that sounded similar, but was nonsense. Also "Page creation, Illegitimate" when I made a new page and put malicious or offensive content on it. This was all done to the "Quagga" page due to an inside joke I have with my friend group. I also created the "Quwegga Project", which was encouraged by said friends, but was executed by me nonetheless. If there was another policy an admin for me to read and review then please just let me know. I'm not sure how to prove that I will never vandalize again, but my main purpose for unblocking my account is purely to create a new article (after ensuring I feel ready and it will be up to the Wikipedia standard) to share knowledge on a band I enjoy. Thanks a lot. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hey, I believe I found the policy at WP:VD. Specifically "Blanking, Illegitimate" when I replaced all the words in a specific article with a word that sounded similar, but was nonsense. Also "Page creation, Illegitimate" when I made a new page and put malicious or offensive content on it. This was all done to the "Quagga" page due to an inside joke I have with my friend group. I also created the "Quwegga Project", which was encouraged by said friends, but was executed by me nonetheless. If there was another policy an admin for me to read and review then please just let me know. I'm not sure how to prove that I will never vandalize again, but my main purpose for unblocking my account is purely to create a new article (after ensuring I feel ready and it will be up to the Wikipedia standard) to share knowledge on a band I enjoy. Thanks a lot. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

No, this is not the policy I was looking for. You can't claim that you were deliberately vandalising an article and also simultaneously claim you thought you were in the right, as you did on 25 July 2024. --Yamla (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seasons greetings Yamla! I hope this message finds you in good faith as you get ready for your... VACATION!!! I have been looking for the policy... but can't seem to find it!? I was wondering if you could lead me in the correct direction, or just let me know what the policy is, so I can be well-read before creating my own Wikipedia Article on this incredible enclyopedia. However, I did find a certain policy about being civil. Which I noticed you may have not been following fully. Especially as it would seem you are not assuming I am writing to you in good faith. While I have truly been trying my best to get unblocked the right way, so I can make my contribution that I have been preparing for 5 months. I would also like to mention, that in the past 2 months. I have changed, and I now realize that I was never in the right for making my edits. I would like to apologize fully for the vandalism I did and hope you can see I'm truly trying my best.(MadCarrot01 (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC))Reply