Macrobreed2

You can type your message here regarding any issue with my edits or any requests for article creation. I will try to reply here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahgir (singer) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bhairava7 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahgir (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Macrobreed2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiladitya Chetia (October 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm really sorry, I just do not see the notability here.

Qcne (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

@Macrobreed2 please don't let this discourage you :) Qcne (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Qcne, Thank you so much for your kind words! I appreciate your encouragement and support. I will continue to work on improving other drafts and articles :-) Macrobreed2 (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brooke Bond Taj Mahal Tea House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Mary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

A note to other users - I have fixed the above mentioned disambiguation link. Macrobreed2 (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Your work on Draft:Razorpay

Hi. Thanks very much for the work you’ve done on the draft. Through no fault of yours, the draft you worked on is an old version and very flawed. I’ve done dozens of hours of work to improve it on my Sandbox. I have been speaking with some very senior Wikipedia editors to ensure everything I do complies with Wikipedia policy, and most importantly, prominently features articles that show editors the page meets notability standards. As I disclosed on the Sandbox, I have a COI as an employee of Razorpay. I think I can reconcile the two versions, using the best of your work. For the time being, I’ve removed the original draft from the AfC queue. I hope you don’t mind. I’ve been very meticulous about sourcing and am being extremely conservative in the language to avoid any WP:PROMO. I’ve spent a lot of time looking at WP:GA to learn from model articles. I am concerned some of what you’ve added, like a table with all financing rounds, is not typical of pages about companies and might be considered promotional or excessive detail. This page has been declined 5 times already and if it gets declined again, it could be blacklisted. Even after I substantially cut back on the page and added more high quality sources, an AfC editor declined it on my Sandbox. One of India’s largest private companies won’t have a Wikipedia page if there is not a lot of caution taken in the next submission. It seems safest to try to get a very well-sourced, modest page approved first. Then other editors like you can build on the page if they want and it won’t result in the page being blacklisted. Would you mind if I spend a few days reconciling the versions on my sandbox? Then I will post another note and you can leave me comments before I post this at AfC. Thank you! Kinleysoda (talk) 17:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Kinleysoda,

I appreciate the extensive effort you have put into improving the draft. I want to clarify that I have no connection with the subject and have focused on adding neutral, well-sourced information, including some controversies.

Given your COI, it's understandable to tread carefully. However, it’s crucial that the draft remains neutral and doesn’t appear promotional. The finance table existed in the AFC draft (Draft:Razorpay) since it was moved from the mainspace (I have not added those) and those tables can be removed as part of the clean-up.

I've reviewed your Sandbox draft and noticed that some sources might not be very independent (refer to WP:CHURNALISM). For the best chances of the draft's success, I recommend incorporating the neutral information I’ve added. including the info which does not only and only promote the company.

There is a very controversial history of the namespace, drafts and I believe it being salted by @Explicit at that time was a good step per WP:SKYBLUELOCK.

I'm more than happy to collaborate on this draft, ensuring it's neutral and meets Wikipedia’s standards. Let’s work together to get this right. (Take your time and ping me here once you have merge the changes I did in AFC draft, be sure to include information which also address the controversies/criticism of organization, not only what you think is best).

Thank you!

Best, Macrobreed2 (talk) 18:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lendbox has been accepted

Lendbox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top nan% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)