Welcome!

edit

Hello, MAKAMURE, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ETHICS OF CLONING : Human reproductive cloning from shia view point moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, ETHICS OF CLONING : Human reproductive cloning from shia view point, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found of notability (for the book as well as the author) per WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG, or WP:ACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to The Shia jurisprudence and development, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to mecontribs) 18:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Is Shia Islam created by Iranians?. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to mecontribs) 18:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MAKAMURE. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 02:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello how are you, I didn't know how to add my contributions on the talk page on why those articles mustn't be deleted, hence I ignorantly removed the deletion templates, I received some warnings on that and afterwards I never did that. I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not yet quit familiar with certain procedures ,therefore I apologize for such inconveniences and it will never happen again. MAKAMURE (talk) 10:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well clearly you didn't read the template before you removed it, because it clearly says "Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed and do not blank the page." Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethics of Cloning: Human reproductive cloning from Shia view point until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply