User talk:M.nelson/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your draft article, Draft:Kilmainham Mills

Hello, M.nelson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kilmainham Mills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Benevity logo Feb 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benevity logo Feb 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kilmainham Mills

Hello, M.nelson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kilmainham Mills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Marathon Petroleum

Hi M.nelson,

You undid the work of ESGfan (talk): "Undid revision 1065271875 by ESGfan (talk) Doesn't meet WP:DUE. Is this considered significant in secondary sources?"

ESG metrics are increasingly as important as company financials, and are direct data from the company. Can you expand on your reasoning for what part of WP:DUE is not met? Mirrorcoloured (talk) 23:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Sure, per WP:DUE: Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources. A company appearing in a list or database is not a significant or prominent publication (nor is the company's own website). If you or ESGfan think that carbon footprint data should appear on a wide range of company articles, I suggest that you start a centralized discussion to establish consensus first, at a place like WP:VPR, WP:COMPANIES, WP:ENERGY, etc. -M.nelson (talk) 20:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)