Lurker9999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not a single one :) Lurker9999 (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lurker9999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologize for my actions, and I accept the consequences. I am not asking to be unblocked. I am only asking for an opportunity discuss an issue with an administrator. If someone is willing, could we please discuss here on my talk page. Thank You for your time. Lurker9999 (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; user has specified that they are not requesting an unblock. Yunshui 雲水 07:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So what do you want to discuss? Max Semenik (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- The Andre Marin article is pretty harsh on the man. I'm not saying that it's not deservedly so, honestly. And the article is well sourced too. All the same, could someone impartial give it a read and maybe an edit?
- Just double-check that it fits well within your existing policies for a biography for a living person, please. Lurker9999 (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)