Welcome to Wikipedia from the Wikiproject Medicine! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of content about health here on Wikipedia, pursuing the mission of Wikipedia to provide the public with articles that present accepted knowledge, created and maintained by a community of editors.

One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board!

First, some basics about editing Wikipedia, which is a strange place behind the scenes; you may find some of the ways we operate to be surprising. Please take your time and understand how this place works. Here are some useful links, which have information to help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

  • Everything starts with the mission - the mission of Wikipedia is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, working in a community of editors. (see WP:NOT)
  • We find "accepted knowledge" for biomedical information in sources defined by WP:MEDRS -- we generally use literature reviews published in good journals or statements by major medical or scientific bodies and we generally avoid using research papers, editorials, and popular media as sources for such content. We read MEDRS sources and summarize them, giving the most space and emphasis (what we call WP:WEIGHT) to the most prevalent views found in MEDRS sources.
  • Please see WPMED's "how to" guide for editing content about health
  • More generally please see The five pillars of Wikipedia and please be aware of the "policies and guidelines" that govern what we do here; these have been generated by the community itself over the last fifteen years, and you will need to learn them (which is not too hard, it just takes some time). Documents about Wikipedia - the "back office" - reside in "Wikipedia space" where document titles are preceded by "Wikipedia:" (often abbreviated "WP:"). WP space is separate from "article space" (also called "mainspace") - the document at WP:CONSENSUS is different from, and serves as a different purpose than, the document at Consensus.

Every article and page in Wikipedia has an associated talk page, and these pages are essential because we editors use them to collaborate and work out disagreements. (This is your Talk page, associated with your user page.) When you use a Talk page, you should sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment; the Wikipedia software will automatically convert that into links to your Userpage and this page and will add a datestamp. This is how we know who said what. We also "thread" comments in a way that you will learn with time. Please see the Talk Page Guidelines to learn how to use talk pages.

  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. You can also just add our talk page to your watchlist and join in discussions that interest you. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note below if you have any questions or problems. I wish you all the best here in Wikipedia! --Jytdog (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
148   Resignation (talk) Add sources
729   Dapoxetine (talk) Add sources
7   Aceprometazine (talk) Add sources
40   Isodiapher (talk) Add sources
17   Nemonapride (talk) Add sources
44   Biological psychiatry (talk) Add sources
164   Eating disorder not otherwise specified (talk) Cleanup
47   Antidepressants and suicide risk (talk) Cleanup
246   Moclobemide (talk) Cleanup
2,511   Citalopram (talk) Expand
2,552   Venlafaxine (talk) Expand
123   Rose bengal (talk) Expand
76   Development and discovery of SSRI drugs (talk) Unencyclopaedic
47   Sexual maturation disorder (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,610   Mental disorder (talk) Unencyclopaedic
828   Folie à deux (talk) Merge
358   Dressing (medical) (talk) Merge
343   Respiratory center (talk) Merge
7   Dinoxyline (talk) Wikify
7   Proxyfan (talk) Wikify
24   Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (talk) Wikify
32   Data ownership (talk) Orphan
6   History of electroconvulsive therapy in the United States (talk) Orphan
8   Max Fink (talk) Orphan
122   Waxy flexibility (talk) Stub
15   Rimcazole (talk) Stub
5   Didesmethylcitalopram (talk) Stub
8   Ergocornine (talk) Stub
6   Ifoxetine (talk) Stub
7   Liafensine (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,359   Universal Postal Union (talk) Add sources
156   G-test (talk) Add sources
28   Penfluridol (talk) Add sources
58   Reading education in the United States (talk) Add sources
49   Demographic statistics (talk) Add sources
21   D2-like receptor (talk) Add sources
82   Child and adolescent psychiatry (talk) Cleanup
145   Correlogram (talk) Cleanup
492   Separation anxiety disorder (talk) Cleanup
54   Divergence (statistics) (talk) Expand
36   Controversies about psychiatry (talk) Expand
93   Asymptotic theory (statistics) (talk) Expand
172   Multivariate adaptive regression splines (talk) Unencyclopaedic
13   PRC200 (talk) Unencyclopaedic
108   Ethylphenidate (talk) Unencyclopaedic
36   Plug-in principle (talk) Merge
144   M-estimator (talk) Merge
374   Resampling (statistics) (talk) Merge
5   Jackknife variance estimates for random forest (talk) Wikify
80   Vesicular monoamine transporter (talk) Wikify
25   Tametraline (talk) Wikify
37   Autistic catatonia (talk) Orphan
2   Elina Hemminki (talk) Orphan
4   William Reid (psychiatrist) (talk) Orphan
17   Madiran (talk) Stub
11   Desmethylcitalopram (talk) Stub
8   Saint-Mont (talk) Stub
11   Lubazodone (talk) Stub
16   Desmethylclozapine (talk) Stub
21   Desmethylsertraline (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,167   National Novel Writing Month (talk) Add sources
1,491   Paroxetine (talk) Add sources
90   Shelbyville, Tennessee (talk) Add sources
3,302   F. Scott Fitzgerald (talk) Add sources
930   Source code (talk) Add sources
572   Anorgasmia (talk) Add sources
205   Plagiarism detection (talk) Cleanup
1,069   Oppositional defiant disorder (talk) Cleanup
928   Open access (talk) Cleanup
3,594   Cannabis in Canada (talk) Expand
35   Serials crisis (talk) Expand
1,226   Lisdexamfetamine (talk) Expand
234   Anti-psychiatry (talk) Unencyclopaedic
135   Comparison of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (talk) Unencyclopaedic
26   DeepDyve (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,625   Maximum likelihood estimation (talk) Merge
681   Somatosensory system (talk) Merge
668   Spinothalamic tract (talk) Merge
5   Joseph Owens (Jesuit) (talk) Wikify
20   History of open access (talk) Wikify
8   Publication subvention (talk) Wikify
3   Nonprimary motor cortex (talk) Orphan
27   Internet phobia (talk) Orphan
5   Chlamydia research (talk) Orphan
7   Sarah Selecky (talk) Stub
3   Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming (talk) Stub
4   LY-367,265 (talk) Stub
6   Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics (talk) Stub
59   Scirus (talk) Stub
100   Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


p-value edit

I answered your comment on the p-value talk page. Richard Gill (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Antidepressants edit

I saw that you undid my edits on the antidepressant page. While I am sure that you had good intentions, I removed that content because it was of exceptionally low quality. A Wikipedia article should not just be a list of studies followed by a one sentence explanation of what they contain: a Wikipedia article should be concise and relevant. I am still in the process of replacing this information with higher quality content, but it the meantime I would appreciate if you didn't revert my edits. Wikiman2718 (talk) 02:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

hey User:Wikiman2718, I agree that this could be improved and it would be great if you could do that. however, how you left the article now is worse than before; for example, the more than a decade old star*d trial is explained in complete detail while the most recent systematic reviews from the last years are missing.Lucleon (talk) 16:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Antidepressants and the Placebo Effect" by Kirsch (2014) edit

Hello Lucleon. What do you think about mentioning this in the article? Am I getting into WP:UNDUE territory here? Puduḫepa (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is an interesting article but there are many articles with all kinds of different opinions regarding the clinical efficacy of antidepressants. Note also the most recent and most extensive meta-analysis/systematic review on antidepressants from 2018 (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32802-7/fulltext) and the discussion surrounding it.Lucleon (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
The link doesn't work. Puduḫepa (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, here it is again: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32802-7/fulltext
Thank you. Puduḫepa (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

By the way, feel free to edit the page. Cheers, Puduḫepa (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply