User talk:SocialistJason/1

January 2021

Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Claire McCaskill, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 12:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Cornyn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2020 United States Senate election in Arkansas, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 10:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision diffs
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DanCherek (talk) 13:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 New Jersey gubernatorial election. jp×g 13:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nina Turner. jp×g 13:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IHateAccounts (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Lovin'Politics, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lovin'Politics! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

idk

just talk here :)

Opening day of the 117th United States Congress moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Opening day of the 117th United States Congress, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Indiana Elections

Hello, Lovin'Politics,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2010 Indiana Elections, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2008 Indiana elections

Hello Lovin'Politics,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2008 Indiana elections, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at 2008 United States presidential election in Indiana. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake, tag removed. Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lovin'Politics

Thank you for creating 2022 Indiana elections.

User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for adding this article to the body of Wikipedia. Keep up the good work, it's important.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 14:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in US Politics (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Women in US Politics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Women in US Politics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of John Watson (Missouri) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Watson (Missouri) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Watson (Missouri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jenyire2 06:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Jason Bean moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jason Bean, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Patty Lewis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patty Lewis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

2002 Missouri State Auditor election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2002 Missouri State Auditor election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

2022 Missouri elections moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2022 Missouri elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lovin'Politics! Your additions to Missouri Senate have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Byron Donalds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anna Eshoo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2022 Missouri State Auditor election

The article 2022 Missouri State Auditor election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of anything notable about this particular election.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

2006 Missouri State Auditor election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2006 Missouri State Auditor election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rep donalds

Hello, Lovin'Politics,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Rep donalds, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 10:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Bill Nelson

I reverted your edit to Bill Nelson because it was unsourced, and because it stated something that is not mentioned elsewhere in the article. The lead is a summary of the article, and in any article that is more than a stub, the lead should include only items that are covered (and sourced) elsewhere in the article. - Donald Albury 16:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

United States House Committee on Appropriations

added a link pointing to Tom Rooney

United States House Committee on Financial Services

added a link pointing to John Campbell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 Missouri State Auditor election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Missouri State Auditor election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Missouri State Auditor election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kennedy family. Sundayclose (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Missouri State Congressional Term Limits Amendment of 1992

The article Missouri State Congressional Term Limits Amendment of 1992 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sundayclose (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hatnotes

Regarding this edit, don't link pages that are already included in the disambiguation page linked in the hatnote. And don't put "See also" templates in hatnotes. Sundayclose (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert: post-1992 US politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Twassman | Talk | Contribs 01:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Userbox?

Your articles-created Userbox states that you have created more than six million articles. I am impressed!! David notMD (talk) 02:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

lol I just troll with that one

I ma here 10+ years, 32,000+ edits, and have created only two articles. So, jealous of your productivity. David notMD (talk) 08:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse

Perhaps refrain from any more advice-giving at Teahouse until you have a better idea of how to provide productive help. David notMD (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Again, your responses at Teahouse are not useful, as either too vague or misleading. Please refrain from "helping" at Teahouse until you have a better understanding. David notMD (talk) 09:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karla Eslinger

The article Karla Eslinger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Amkgp 💬 15:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

A word of advice

You've received several warnings about making unsourced edits, including a final warning. Yet you continue to make unsourced edits regularly. Archiving the warnings does not make them go away. Removing warnings is taken as evidence that you have read them. The first thing an administrator will check is the history of this talk page for warnings when a report is made about your unsourced edits. And that report is inevitable and close at hand if you continue on this path. I'm giving you one last benefit of the doubt. If there's something you don't understand about the core policies of W:V and WP:RS, ask right here, right now before your next edit. Otherwise after your next unsourced edit you likely will lose your editing privileges. Also note that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, so refusing to communicate is not an option. You make some helpful edits, but after all the warnings, those good edits will not prevent a block. I hope that doesn't happen, but at this point that is entirely up to you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Sundayclose ok

New message from Sundayclose

Hello, SocialistJason. You have new messages at Sundayclose's talk page.
Message added 01:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sundayclose (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)