Jeleel! moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Jeleel!, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you so much Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 08:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeleel! (July 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Love Dont Cost A Dime! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeleel! edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeleel!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 10:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Jimfbleak Hi, i noticed you blocked me and your reason "Abusing Multiple Accounts" which i know i'm not. You did not mention the account you think i'm abusing because you ain't a checkuser, I'm sorry i moved the Jeleel page, pleae unblock me. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm new here and learning things. This is my only account. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

@Jimfbleak accused me of Sock which i'm not, please unblock me. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Interesting that as a supposed new user, you know what a checkuser is and how to see if I'm one. Also that you know how to ping me and how to format an article. I blocked you as a sock of User:SpotterZone. I don't need a checkuser because you posted near identical promo article for Jeleel!.
For example, you wrote ⋅Jeleel Yussuf, (born October 14, 1995), better known by his stage name JELEEL!, is a Nigerian-American rapper. He is celebrated for combining multiple genres like hyperpop and emo rap among others.[2][3] He is known for his energetic songs and high-pitch vocals that clash with his muscular physique and Spotterzone wrote Jeleel Yussuf, (born October 14, 1995), better known for his stage name JELEEL!, is an American rapper. He is celebrated for combining multiple genres like hyperpop and emo rap[2] among others. He is known for his energetic songs and high-pitch vocals that clash with his muscular physique, coincidence or what? You have also failed to disclose your obvious WP:COI or whether you have a financial interest in writing these promos Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have been active and has read about wikipedia and did understand the ranks of users. It wasn't me that wrote it and i have no connection with user:SpotterZone, i only wanted to make a wikipedia page for the rapper and saw there was a draft made by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SpotterZone which i followed his style but i promise i have no connection with him and i had no financial interest in helping to contribute to the article, i saw his performance at Rolling Loud which went viral and i got interested in creating a page for him, i truly understand maybe some of the sources used ain't reliable and moving the page by me was not good and i apologize for that. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean Dawson for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Dawson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Dawson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ye Ali for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ye Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ye Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Request for unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Love Dont Cost A Dime (block log ‱ active blocks ‱ global blocks ‱ contribs ‱ deleted contribs ‱ filter log ‱ creation log ‱ change block settings ‱ unblock ‱ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

My account was blocked by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jimfbleak with a claim of abusing multiple accounts, the user claimed that i'm a sockpuppet of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SpotterZone which i know i'm not, i joined wikipedia 23 days ago and took my time to read and watch videos on how to edit because i have been so much interested in contributing on here and that's why i have only been making stub articles, i wanted to make a stub article for an artist Jeleel and i saw there was a draft article made by User:SpotterZone but i have no connection with user:SpotterZone and i don't have connection with the subject, i saw his performance on Rolling Loud, i searched about him and saw some sources which i agree that most of them may not be reliable and also i understand maybe the article reads promotional but i have no connection with User:SpotterZone. I apologize for moving the page inappropriately and i promise to take my time to learn more and contribute without going against Wikipedia's policy. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not socking, but seems to be UPE. If you come clean we can talk -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your edit

connection with JELEEL!? Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why did you not just collaborate with the other editor instead of creating a new page? Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Deepfriedokra, i have no connection with JELEEL!, i watched his performance at Rolling Loud which went viral because of the way he performed, i researched about him and wanted to make a stub page for him but i found out that an editor already have a Draft article about him which i copied some of the information there. I promise you i have no connection with JELEEL! I sincerely apologize for not contributing with the other editor because they used his real name Jeleel Yusuf to draft the article, i know that is not an excuse but that was the reason why i had to create it with the rappers moniker, also i created the article on mainspace. I'm still new and systematically learning things on Wikipedia as a new editor, i sincerely apologize for my wrongs and i promise not to repeat it again or go against the wikipedia rules but to contribute and improve Wikipedia. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry, but Jim has said, that there is a connection is obvious Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jimfbleak allegedly blocked my account for abusing multiple accounts, the user i was accused of being their Sockpuppet @Jimfbleak only banned the user and blocked me indefinitely, I'm not trying to be judgemental but i want to make it clear that this is my only account and being blocked for trying to improve wikipedia makes me feel bad. I have created some stub pages with this account and that would also help prove that i'm no sock of the user claimed i'm. I'm so so hurt but there is absolutely nothing i can do because i'm not an admin and it is not in my hands to decide. If i have connectyion with JELEEL! other users wouldn't have created a draft article [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeleel ]] for him, I would really really appreciate if you or anyone could investigate, check and please help in unblocking my account, thank you so much. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 07:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Deepfriedokra, as always, I'm happy to go along with whatever you decide, just to note that this user's close-up image of Jeleel here looks to me as if it not just an image taken from the crowd, and it's dated months before the Rolling Loud gig Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jimfbleak @Deepfriedokra Sir/ma, i got the image from here which was published 2 years ago, i went to JELEEL!'s instagram and saw that JELEEL posted the picture February before the publication that was why i put the first date JELEEL! published it which was in february 2020. I sincerely apologize for my wrongs, we all have our regrettable moments and i regret not contributing with the other editor and moved the page inappropriately. But i want you to know that i have no connection with JELEEL! i was only moving too fast to create articles which i'm now regretting but please i will really appreciate if you could please forgive me and give me another chance. I have learnt my lessons and i will definitely improve and contribute without violating any of the wikipedia's policy. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 12:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
And yet you uploaded it as your own work. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Since you falsely claimed that the image was your won work, why should we believe what you are saying now? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:06, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra @Jimfbleak Sir/ma, please believe me, i was just ignorant, i uploaded it but it's not my work. I will never repeat this mistakes again, please give me another chance and watch me improve without violating any of the rules that governs here sir/ma. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 13:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra I did uploaded it and put it my own work because i was ignorant but it's not my work, i have learnt my lessons now please accept my apology Sir/Ma, i sincerely didn't know that would affect me. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 13:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please sir/ma @Deepfriedokra @Jimfbleak Another chance would really mean the world to me and i promise never to repeat the mistakes i made, Thank you so much. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
As it sits, it is probably a WP:COPYVIO. I've literally uploaded hundreds of images to Commons. When you upload an image, you are asked to identify the source. You might want to do that if you are not blocked on Commons-- change the licensing information and identify the source.. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra I was ignorant of that, i don't know how i can change the licensing information for now but i will learn about it sir/ma. If i'm unblocked i would not be uploading on commons until i learn more and understand how to do it. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra, the page is marked Native © 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, I can't see how that can be compatible with our free use requirements Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra Please sir/ma, this is my only account and being blocked it's really affecting me. Please get me back to editing, This time i promise to contribute properly without violating any rules that governs wikipedia, thank you so much. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You've an open unblock request on your talk. Another admin will review it. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay sir/ma, thank you so much. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra Hi sir/ma, Happy weekend and how are you doing today? my unblock request is yet to be reviewed, i would really appreciate if you could please rereview it or invite someone to. thank you so much sir/ma Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 14:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. later today. maybe -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra Thank you so much sir/ma Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jimfbleak: I'm willing if you are. But,
  • all new article creations must be via WP:AFC drafts and vetted by AFC reviewers before moving to article space. No direct creation of articles in article space
  • only one account
  • please disclose any outside connections-- please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID
  • no, absolutely no- this is a zero tolerance item- use of images or text copyrighted from elsewhere.
Awaiting assent of blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
For the record, I ran a check at @Deepfriedokra's request. Love Dont Cost A Dime is technically  Â Unrelated to SpotterZone and no socks are immediately visible. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@L235 and Deepfriedokra: thanks Kevin. DFO, as long as the editor sticks with those conditions, OK by me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Jimfbleak @Deepfriedokra I'm willing sir/ma, i promise to stick with the conditions above. Thank you so much sir/ma for your time and continuous hardwork to make sure everything is okay on here, i really appreciate all the efforts and i promise to stick with the conditions and contribute properly. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 19:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
There has been a further development. See decline -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra Sir/ma, i sincerely don't know about Wikipedia UPE but i googled Wikipedia UPE now and saw that it's all about paid editors, to be sincerely speaking sir i'm not and will never be. All the edits i made i have no connection with any of them and i was not paid i promise you sir/ma. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 23:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra sir/ma, i have read and understand the conditions listed above and i promise to stick with the conditions and work with them, Thank you so much sir/ma. Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk) 23:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of AV (musician) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AV (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AV (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 12:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean Dawson for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Dawson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Dawson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply