Louisheadchurch
|
August 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Louis Head, Nova Scotia has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UlWDigyts. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Louis Head, Nova Scotia worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 23:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
February 2012 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Louis Head, Nova Scotia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Louis Head, Nova Scotia was changed by Louisheadchurch (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866754 on 2012-02-03T19:16:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I've reverted your additions to this article as it shows all the signs of being copy and pasted from somewhere and so highly likely to be a copyright violation. Please could you explain, either here or on the article's talk page, the source of the material and not re-add it until this issue has been clarified. Assuming that there are no copyright problems the text should still be wikified before being re-inserted. Dpmuk (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in replying but I wanted to get a second opinion on this from a more experienced copyright admin, and after doing so we still have some concerns. Firstly some of the text originally inserted appears to have been taken from [1] which, I think understandably, raises concerns about the rest. Secondly this edit suggests that part of the text is a transcribed speech in which case the copyright likely rests with the speaker.
- Being honest this text is raising a lot of red flags but in this instance I'm inclined to believe it's more likely a case of the text being used in multiple places by multiple people and that you may indeed be the copyright holder for a lot of it (apart from possibly the speech bit). However to use the material it would be useful to have some way of verifying that you are the original author.
- Being honest again I also think that the text you are trying to introduce is far too detailed for an encyclopaedia entry. I'd suggest that an article on a village of this size is more likely to be a few paragraphs in length. Bearing all that in mind can I suggest that the easiest way to deal all this might be for you to write a shorter summary from scratch based on the information in your edit. By doing this we should end up with an article that is both free of copyvios and more encyclopaedic. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Dpmuk (talk) 03:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)