Your submission reviewed by me(tausif) edit

Hi! I am glad you've taken interest to write a geniuine article. I am afraid, I dont see any inline references in your article. References help will guide you to how and what to give reference for. Inline reference as in the references from a reliable source to substantiate the fact that you've provided. Moreover, please quote references to prove the notability of the subject in the article. Once again, thank you for your contribution.
-tausif r (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 00:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Sweet Jane (Band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Reekus Records, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 Chzz  ►  22:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif r (talk) 13:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


  • To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lorcanmce (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi I was just wondering why My article wasn't accepted I have loads of references and the band played on John Peel's Show, participated in Self Aid which was a huge event in ireland, their music was used as the RTE show Vision Eyes intro and it's all referenced in the article so could you let me know what needs to be explained more and I can change it but like I said they're are lots of references in the article.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Big Self edit

Hello Lorcanmce, thank you for your note, I would be happy to work with you on this article :). I think you're right that the article is almost ready to be accepted, you just need to beef up your sourcing a little bit. This article doesn't seem to mention Big Self, so it should be removed. This and this are just trivial mentions, so they don't help us to establish notability. This seems to have been written by Big Self's record company, so it is not a third-party source and is not necessarily reliable. The best sources you have right now are [1], [2]. I don't know enough about music to know if these count as reliable, so you might consider asking someone from WikiProject Music for advice. If those are reliable, though, they are enough to establish notability on their own.

If you could add in the magazine clippings, that would be awesome and would almost certainly push this article past the notability threshold. See WP:CITE#Newspaper artices for information on how to cite magazine articles. It's pretty similar to citing web sources. Once you add those in, resubmit the article and another editor (not myself) will review it for any issues I missed before (hopefully) accepting it. Thank you very much for your contributions to the encyclopedia, and let me know if there is anything else I can do for you. :) --Cerebellum (talk) 01:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 05:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Big Self, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

tausif 06:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saccade (band) concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saccade (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Reekus Records edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reekus Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.reekus.com/about/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Banner talk 23:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Reekus Records for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reekus Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reekus Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Saccade (band) edit

 

Hello Lorcanmce. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Saccade (band).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saccade (band)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply