Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Shaughnessy (April 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Looktowindward! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi there @Blaze Wolf. Thanks again for your feedback on this. If you had time, could you take another look at my article, which is now updated with sources/citations? @Tails Wx mentioned below that they would leave it to another reviewer after my improvements. Many thanks. Looktowindward (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Actually, some sources don’t have significant coverage of Shaughnessy, and therefore doesn’t satisfy notability guidelines, per Blaze’s second decline reason above. On second thought, it needs more work. Tails Wx 12:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Shaughnessy (April 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tails Wx 13:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi there. Many thanks for the review and the help. I accidentally submitted the article before adding my sources/citations to the text, which I have here as a list. They are now in the text (both as refs to contributions to graphic design, and also, importantly, to articles where the subject is Adrian himself). Looktowindward (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am also referencing the published works now. Thanks. Looktowindward (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
It looks better, I'll leave it up to another reviewer. Good work on the improvements! Tails Wx 15:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much! Looktowindward (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Shaughnessy has been accepted edit

 
Adrian Shaughnessy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 20:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Looktowindward. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Adrian Shaughnessy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. signed, Rosguill talk 23:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking my IP address edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Looktowindward (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

A block was put on my IP address (the message suggested my IP was within a 'range' that included accounts which had been abusive). I have not been abusive on the site. I am currently accessing Wikipedia via another Wifi to write this, so as yet haven't checked at home if the block has already been lifted (I left a message for the person who had blocked the IP, via another account I set up, but they have not replied yet). Thanks.

Decline reason:

You have not provided your IP so we can look into this. If you don't want to post it publicly(understandable), you may use WP:UTRS to provide it privately. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.