Lolololololololollolol

November 2013

Hello, I'm SeoMac. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Google+ because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SeoMac (talk) 01:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Google+. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Google+ was changed by Lolololololololollolol (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899639 on 2013-11-25T02:00:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Google+, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Icedkongo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)