Loganelm2001

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Neutral Nation is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 06:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 07:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop Adding This Material

Please STOP adding the type of material that you're currently adding to a large number of articles regarding North American native nations and related issues in the Great Lakes area. I just quickly reviewed what you're doing and the information you're posting appears to be based on your *personal interpretation* of these groups and topics, the vast majority of it will not be supported by mainstream sources and thus has no place in Wikipedia. Deconstructhis (talk) 07:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mississaugas, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mississaugas was changed by Loganelm2001 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-17T08:28:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• I'm sorry if I'm seeming a little "heavy handed" on my approach to this, but I've gone over most of the material that you've posted tonight and reverted a fair bit of what I've read. It seems to me that the material that you're posting here is a very heavily biased presentation of history that may have merit in terms of being the Haudenosaunee version of events, but is not supported by either a mainstream scholarly perspective or the history and oral traditions of the Anishinabe people. It is my sincere hope that before you invest more time and continue to post unsourced material, that is certainly going to be continualy challenged because of its non-supported non-npov nature, that you keep in mind that unless you can provide proper citations to reputably published sources for what you're contributing, eventually it will all be removed. Deconstructhis (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Loganelm2001 , you will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 08:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. · Dvyjones ^Talk 09:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

No personal attacks, please

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Special:Emailuser/ClueBot Commons, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 08:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete a template from Wikipedia, as you did to Neutral Nation, you will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 08:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|reliable sources, as you did to Erie (tribe). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Attacks on Haudenosaunee people for Editing errors written about there own history

Skenon;

 The village of Taiaiagon, was never a Mississauga village site.

As sited in Percy Robinson's , "Toronto During the French Regime" doesn't locate a Mississauga village on the old site of Taiaiagon. It actually locates a Mississaga village on the west Bank of the Humber River in 1788. The actual statement that the Mississauga chiefs in 1784 understood that they did not own the land or any Indigenous Entitlement to it is found in a prelude record, to the Haldimand Tract. Therefore the information that I have provided, has come from multiple reliable sources and resources. And as for Mississauga oral lore, I very seriously doubt that, as many of them have lost their way of knowing what their past has been. So therefore whether some academics share the same views or not is irrelavant to the facts, and facts that are proven with the test of time, through multiple archaeological excavations done in the Toronto area have yet to reveal any Mississauga burial sites, according the Ontario Ministry of Culture. So your so-called army of academics are far and few between, since you will not get the Ontario Ministry of Culture to agree with your bs Mississauga claims and this sites support of them. Also there are very archaeologists in the Toronto area if any that will also agree with your claims. It is well known, that Taiaiagon was a Seneca-Mohawk village, and also there is other information that I have chosen not share publicly, that also proves that there has been continuous occupation of the site since 9,000 BC. And all of these people are the ancestors of the Iroquoin language family and not Anishnawbek. Toronto is not the traditional homeland of Mississaugas. And that has been verified by many sources, even their own New Credit website, verifies that they came from up north. So by you saying sources are biased and not verified by academic resources, think again before you make such claims, because I can tell that many of your sources, have come from elementary library resources and very out dated materials, that many people no longer believe.

Loganelm2001

Please stop. If you continue to delete templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Teiaiagon, you will be blocked from editing. Deconstructhis (talk) 08:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)