User talk:Locos epraix/Archive 1

Did you intend to edit the English infobox to have a Spanish word instead of "Publisher" ? It has been reverted to English.  :) sinneed (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem at all, I was just afraid you had done what I have... and been in the wrong Wiki. That can be really embarrassing, and I wanted to let you know right away.sinneed (talk) 06:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Usuario:Locobot

The user namespace here is User: so User:Locobot is perhaps what you wanted to create :) –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I moved it to the right place and tagged the other one for deletion. –Capricorn42 (talk) 15:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Zamora

Le he denunciado en vandalismo en curso, esperemos resultados. Un abrazo, Mercedes Gusgus talk 18:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Monobook

Try it again, got rid of both of them. 18:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Plural piping

Is there a reason your bot is making changes such as [[Java applet|applet]]s to [[Java applet|applets]] as on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Java_(programming_language)&curid=15881&diff=285070475&oldid=284703526 , which I think most people would not prefer as it leads to unnecessary work when changing terms used? --Cybercobra (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


Thanks :D

Thanks for reverting my page :D --Jamesooders (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

There we go all gone :D --Jamesooders (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Locobot operating on Turkish wiki?

Would there be any chance you could operate Locobot on Turkish wiki if I cloned {{NUMBEROF}} template? --Superyetkin (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, I am looking forward to it   --Superyetkin (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
You may make it operate on Turkish wiki as early as you wish. Please let me know when you are done with it so that I can go on and update the template to work accordingly. Thanks for your interest. --Superyetkin (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for porting the template to our wiki. I have just renamed the template to Viki istatistikleri as well as the data-holding section to this page. I am going to translate the template into Turkish in a few hours. Please make the necessary adjustments and let me know if I have anything to do for you. Thanks again   --Superyetkin (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks buddy!   I will be using it to keep track of the top 20 wikis. --Superyetkin (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Cosmetic changes.py

Where do I find this script and how do I get it to stop changing image: to file: and WP: to Wikipedia:? Both are annoying and counterproductive. 199.125.109.77 (talk) 16:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Images from Wikisky

Hi astrofriend! I'm here because I have to speak about an important question. I think you know Wikisky, a very nice website with a full coverage of the sky through DSS2 images. As known, the usage of the images taken from this site is not allowed on wikipedia because of CC-NC, although they have no objection for this kind of usage. So, I have written to them. They redirected me to this email address here, and I have requested to them to ask an OTRS ticket for their images, explaining that we can't accept no-commercial images. They gave to me a number of proceeding and said they would have processed the requesting as soon as possible. This happened last October... Since that, I didn't receive any reply. If you are interested, please contact me as soon as possible on it.wiki, so I can give you more details, including what I wrote and what they said exactly. What a wonderful think would be to have the possibility to use images from this site! Bye! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Already done: just two days ago, I have asked to a wikipedian with OTRS access to send again an e-mail to them so we have èrepared and sent this message:

Dear sirs,

last October we have sent to you an e-mail concerning the request to use on Wikipedia the images of DSS2, available on Wikisky.org. We would be very grateful if you agree to grant to us your important resources in order to explain the sky objects. We will use your work only for> divulgative purposes, all commercial use will be strictly prohibited. We> need only a letter from you, following this example:

[to be sent to: permissions-it@wikimedia.org]

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ insert link ].
I agree to publish that work for Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
I am aware that herewith I am granting only to Wikipedia the right to use the work; all commercial use of this work remain prohibited.
I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed.
I am aware that the license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.
I am aware that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a> Wikimedia project.
DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER

Fill those "[]" fields, simply answer this email. After that, an "OTRS ticket" will be release; we can use your work only for divulgative purposes, any commercial use of your images taken from Wikimedia projects will be prohibited.

Waiting for any your reply, I say thank you in advance

[etc..]


They replayed immediately:


Greetings,

Thanks for your interest in using the DSS2. Whilst STScI would normally approve your request as it is an educational & non-commercial use, we do not hold the datarights to the DSS2 images. Even though the digitized versions were created here, they are derived from the original photographic sky survey plates and the original observatories retain the rights to those images. See http://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DataCopyrights.htm I am copying those institutions on my reply and I encourage them to give you permission to use their respective image data.

Regards

-Brian

Dr. Brian McLean
Scientist, Archive Sciences Division
Operations and Engineering Division
Space Telescope Science Institute
[etc...]
Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
[etc...]


So we now are waiting for that. We have suggested the italian queue, because it's quite faster than english one; anyway the validity is the same. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 03:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

As I wrote here, they are contacting them... :-) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Waiting for Wikisky, I'm happy to tell you that we have obtained two OTRS tickets for two nice italian astronical website:
  • CAST {{permissionOTRS|2008072210023406}}
  • Margaro {{PermissionOTRS|2009051510015314}}
Both the websites are in italian language, but it's very easy to understand where are the images and which subject they rappresent, because they follow the number of catalogues. Enjoy! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 05:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Happy for this! :-) I know there was a killing-ride of astronomical objects on Commons... Cheers for your great list, I'll vote if I will be informed! Carina Nebula on it.wiki became FA just 3 days ago! :D Bye!! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 05:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Erasing template

IN RESPONSE TO YOU MESSAGE:

Erasing template

Watching your contributions, I see that you are erasing the template

of articles relationated with the topic. Do you have any reason for it? Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 01:46, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, i have, those ARE NOT Space Agencies, or do you have any supporting documents for that?, if so, you will have to post them at every claim like that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.24.192.100 (talkcontribs) Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 22:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikisky: first step

As I have promised, I'm keeping you updated.

For having the right to use images from Wikisky, we need to do 3 steps, because 3 are the organizations who provide the images to Wikisky. The first step is done: the California Institute of Technology agrees to grant to us the permission to use their survey. I have processed the request (I'm an OTRS operator) and I have given an OTRS number {{permissionOTRS|2009052010051757}} (if you too are an OTRS operator you can verify). Their work is available here and concerns all POSS2 surveys. On italian Wikipedia I have archived their email in this page (don't worry, it's in english :D ). The license is no-commercial. Cheers! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 16:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Bad Locobot edit

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that Locobot made a bit of a mess at the end of Kraków. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 06:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


Help for template

Hello, I've seen your name on the project template and I permis myself to ask you help: I've just created a new portal Portal:Lyon and I would like to create the templates for the subways, trams, bus. They already exist on the french wikipedia of Lyon metro for example. would you accept to help me ? Thank you Lulu97417 (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Typo in bot edit summary

[1] "Substituying" should be "Substituting". best, –xeno talk 18:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Templates and speedy deletion

Hi there. I just declined a bunch of redirected templates you tagged for G6 because they might be useful redirects and are quite old. I listed them at WP:RFD for you instead at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 24#Redirects to Template:Navbox / Template:Infobox Person. Please add your reasoning as to why these redirects should be deleted to that nomination. Regards SoWhy 21:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Plume Moth

Hi. I reverted your edits to Plume Moth—an easy mistake to make. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Locobot changing sequence of references

Hi, I've reverted most of this bot change to George Metesky. When a statement requires multiple references, I think our readers will logically expect the most important reference, not the one with the least wikitext, to be first. Admittedly this is less convenient for us editors. Cheers, CliffC (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Wiki Fixes by Your bot

A few hours ago your bot put the Lifetime banner on Andy Kerr. Because it put no valid values for the various parameters the banner, among other lapses the template appears on the page and as there is a legitimate DEFAULTSORT value later on the page this appears in read on the page:

Warning: Default sort key "Kerr, Andy" overrides earlier default sort key "{{{4}}}"

I have removed the damage that your bot did because the error cause the page to appear in Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts a category I monitor closely. I do not know the nature of the other damage your bot has caused so I could not repair it.

JimCubb (talk) 15:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Likewise Augusto Pinochet and Thelma Johnson Streat. How many others did the bot screw up but did not cause a DEFAULTSORT conflict?

JimCubb (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not merely pleasantly surprised at your response, I am thrilled and astounded. I have yet to find and editor whose bot made errors who corrected those errors yet alone was willing to check for previous errors.

Thank you very much.

JimCubb (talk) 22:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Locobot & CompactTOC8

Locobot did something strange to {{CompactTOC8}} here. --Pascal666 04:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Breaks in lists

ICL 2900 Series‎ - why did you add the breaks? I mean, I see the endash and the defaultsort (I'm not convinced by the defaultsort, mind you), but what difference do the
tags make? Or were they added in error, given that it's a second bulleted list in the section?

--ClickRick (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Do you mean this change?, my bot took off the breaks because they're unnecessary and are part of the wikisintax errors found in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Locos epraix (talkcontribs) 21:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that's the change. "Unnecessary" I understand and agree with, but I don't understand what difference the tags actually make by being there, i.e. what problem they cause. Or is it just a case of tidying it up?
--ClickRick (talk) 21:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
See the project description of Check Wikipedia, there is a defined description of the goal of those modifications. Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 22:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Title linked in text

I didn't get all of the way through them; you could probably work backwards from the end of the list and not run into the ones DrilBot did for quite awhile. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay; just thought I'd mention it. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Locobot edit

This edit made by Locobot un-hid a ton of categories that are best hidden. Not sure why it moved the <includeonly></includeonly> tags, but thought I'd let you know... Strikehold (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Unnecessary defaultsort

I was wondering why your bot made this edit. A defaultsort is only needed if the article should be listed in the categories by a word which isn't the first word of the article title - not the case here. --JD554 (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Locobot error on Warsaw Convention

Not sure what Locobot was doing with this edit, I have changed it back. But you might want to look into it.--kelapstick (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I deleted two instances of the same today. Then I saw here that your bot is responsible for this. Would you please stop it from doing this. Debresser (talk) 21:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Same error, it's already fixed, so it won't happen again. Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 22:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Second step done

here you are! :-) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 11:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Locobot broke imagemap

In [2] Locobot broke an imagemap by removing a selflink. It was found after a report at Wikipedia:Help desk#Image map errors at Area code 480 and Area code 602. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Removed speedy deletion tag: Commando Battalion for Resolute Action

Hi Locos epraix! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Commando Battalion for Resolute Action- because: there is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. decltype (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Nikos Thanopoulos

Sorry, I had to revert your changes on the article, because there is an IP user that keeps editing the page with false information about this person.El-greco (talk) 09:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

{{Infobox Coin}} whitespace changes

Hi,

Any particular reason for the removal of whitespace in this edit? I rather think it makes it easier to maintain the template. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

{{Infobox F1 driver}} edit reverted

Hi,

Sorry, but I had to revert the change you made to {{Infobox F1 driver}} because AutoEd removed the whitespace which keeps the template easy to maintain. If you're going to use AutoEd in templatespace, it might be a good idea to turn off the whitespace module. Cheers. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

... heh, didn't even realise I'd left you a message on the same topic yesterday! :) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: New future template

Saw them, thanks! Thanks for the numbers as well, I didn't want to confuse myself by putting them in until the very end, but that's fine. ninety:one 22:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Re your edits to the various Naruto: Shippude episode list talk pages

I have reverted your changing of these lists' class ratings to "list" as that is not how the anime/manga project assesses lists. Except for pure lists, which these are not, we rate all lists on the same Stub-B scale as any other article. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

What do you want to do?

By deleting {{unincorporated community}} and {{village}}? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't feel strongly either way, I just wanted to make sure that there was a good reason - and you have one. Which process it goes by is less of an issue for me. Cheers, Carlossuarez46 (talk) 04:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

G6

Hi, when you tag something with a speedy delete G6, please give the reason, as often it is not obvious that it is non-controversial, or what the reason to delete is. You seemed to have tagged a lot of templates, perhaps you meant to say they were unused? perhaps {{db-duplicatetemplate}} or they may need TfD discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Can you promise me that none are in use? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Or that content was not merged to the redirected template? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox domus (Roman house)

for Template:Infobox domus (Roman house) this is not a policy representation, but is it a hoax? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Ups, it was a single use template (in Domus), I don't think it's a hoax. Anyway it is useless now that the code is directly in the article. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 01:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
This is a merge situation whereby the history would have to be maintained, or at least User:Amadscientist credited to comply with GFDL or the -BY- part of the license granted. Can you see a way to enable that? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
The infobox was added by an IP. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 14:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:WW

I wish you would have contacted me before putting this up for deletion. I can close the TFD and redirect this template into {{weasel-inline}} Ikip (talk) 04:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Ping

Hi,

You forgot to sign Here.

Thanks. --KrebMarkt 21:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 15:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Doc page

Hi again, I can't tell why deleting Template:Doc page or Template:Doc talk is non controversial. Can you add the reason in the the speedy tag please? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Done Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 14:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Request

I saw this edit. I have also noticed often in userboxes that <div> comes on a new line. Why is this? Could you please explain this for me? Debresser (talk) 18:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Those
tags are used to group the elements in the list to avoid an whitespace issue at top and bottom of the list. This is also used in navboxes. Try removing those div tags and you'll see what I'm talking about. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Or, do you mean the new line? I think that's to improve code legibility. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I meant the second. Thanks for your explanation. Debresser (talk) 20:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

{{Infobox Non-profit}}

I'm not sure what happened, but I've reverted the last two edits you made to this template. It appears that a bracket was left out somewhere, causing the rest of the template to act wonky. Cheers! TNXMan 19:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for the ping. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 23:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Mexican sqaud templates

Hi do you think the other Mexican second division templates should also be deleted? See these templates most of them have mostly redlinks. Black'nRed 23:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Most of them seem deletable for me. But the problem is that there is no clear consensus about "x team current squad"-like templates. Searching in WP:FOOTBALL discussion archives I wasn't neither able to find a consensus. Perhaps only this. Should we start a general discussion there? Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 00:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of subpages

A template doc page or similar subpage that has no parent template should be marked using {{db-subpage}} under criterion G8, not {{db-g6}}. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I use {{db-g6}} because some time ago another admin missed the redirect (from parent page to another template) and though the subpage did have parent page. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Citation/core/sandbox

I wanted to look into the HTML id problem, but discovered that Template:Citation/core/sandbox is in a weird state, with its history lost and it being tagged by you with {{db-g6}}. I assume it's not safe to edit now? When will it be safe? Eubulides (talk) 06:11, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

It looks like the history merge was not completely fulfilled. Anyway, you already started, luck. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 17:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Switch vs if

Does this patch improve performance? If so, why is #if+#switch so much faster than #switch? Eubulides (talk) 17:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not completely sure about it. Before it checked |Ref= against a #switch (4 possible choices, something useless when Ref is empty). Now before the #switch it checks if |Ref= is empty or not, if not empty it compares |Ref= against a #switch (3 possible parameters). Not much difference, trivial I would say. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
The #switch is simpler and clearer (at least to me) than the cascading #if+#switch; OK if we stick with #switch alone? Eubulides (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
If you think it's better I have no problem if you use #switch alone. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

*Polite cough*

Hullo, why are you trying to have my sandboxes deleted?  Skomorokh  21:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, some of them haven't been edited since a looong time and they have template:XXX/Sandbox with the "S" uppercased instead of sandbox. If you still use them feel free to revert me. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 21:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply; why would you think having an uppercased title or not having been edited are reasons for deletion?  Skomorokh  21:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
When I see a sandbox template with uppercase title I always try to translate it. Why? because the template doc display a link to sandbox (when not uppercased). Not been edited since a while also is a valid reason for deletion, numerous sandbox subtemplates clutter the template namespace. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 21:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Locobot

Hello. Could you please run Locobot on Turkish wiki? It has been nearly a month since it last updated this page. Thanks! --Superyetkin (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion

FYI: [3] The Four Deuces (talk) 06:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

la piedad templete

why did you delete it again.. it's pretty stupid. i created more articles so that it wouldn't be deleted again. I think once again that this is some sort of discrimination of Mexican soccer on behalf of Wikipedia users...Nore100 (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Infobox single fix

Thanks for fixing the issue with {{Infobox single}}. — John Cardinal (talk) 22:02, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiBirthday

 

I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Locos epraix

  Hey, Locos epraix. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
-- Vatsan34 (talk) 09:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Broken template? Sinclair (surname)

Hi, the article Sinclair (surname) is very badly broken in my browser. I thought it was the bot edit that broke it, so I reverted it. Apparently both templates concerning "Family name" (old and new) are broken though (I take there's a re-direct, but I don't know). It looks like the image_size parameter is not being honored any more (man, the image goes from 150px to now being wider than my screen, just huge). I just don't know how to fix it. I would prefer it if the bot held off until the templates are fixed though. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

It's fixed now. The server has a very long job queue and it takes long time for articles to update. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 15:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Cambio

He hecho el cambio en la plantilla. Por favor aseg{urate de que esté correcto, tengo un acceso muy limitado a intenret y hasta dentro de una hora podré regresar a hacer cualquier corrección. -- m:drini 16:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Colombia Collaboration Invitation

  WikiProject Colombia
You have been invited to participate in Collaboration of the Month to improve and standardize the List of Presidents of Colombia in hopes of raising it to featured list status.

mijotoba (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

About the Zamora (musician) AfD

A heads-up that Angelamuziotti (talk · contribs) moved the comment you made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamora (musician). I moved it back once, and (s)he moved it again (diff). Your call on whether you want to move the placement or leave it be.

I know at the start of the AfD you mentioned some sockpuppetry concerns. Is it concrete enough that, if it affects the results of the AfD, it's worth filing a case at WP:SSP? Something doesn't feel write between Angelamuziotti and Katydelmar (talk · contribs), but I'm only going on a hunch and the way they sign their messages. —C.Fred (talk) 00:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I restored my comment to its original position. It's pretty clear we have a sockpuppetry case here. It happened the last time this articled was AFD'ed and it's hapenning in spanish wikipedia (where I oppened a consulta de borrado). I'm sure that Katydelmar, Zfans, Alejandrozamora, Angelamuziotti, Bbgirl, Zhakira and Vmusic are all connected to A. Zamora and all of them were involved with this article. There was a SSP but no action was taken that time. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 01:33, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Angela moved it again. This is somewhat annoying. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 01:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
If she moves it again, I won't change it back; instead I'll put a comment on the page and file an WP:AN/I report for tampering. —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Well then, here we go. --Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 02:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
And here we go at AN/I. —C.Fred (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

I was trying to make a wikipedia page for the singer Devin Chase but for reason it got deleted. ReckyBecky (talk) 03:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

Thanks for the suggestion about   - User:Designate made a good list of arguments for why a "checklist" style icon has some advantages to the current one which are worth reading, but that particular design had passed me by. TheGrappler (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)