Lobby And TheoTheoDerich

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lobby And TheoTheoDerich

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Lobby And TheoTheoDerich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blue Riband► 02:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it’s my own userpage, and you guys don’t have the rights to delete my userpage, I am an new user. Please do not delete it, I am an developer of TheoTown. --Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 02:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

It's not your userpage & if administrators find that it's been named, for advertising? Then it will be deleted. GoodDay (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

No! Wait! Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Lobby And TheoTheoDerich", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it may impersonate a real person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Politanvm ^talk 02:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Of course, it meets the criteria for username policy! No more warnings rom admins! I am an game developer, and I have the freedom because my account was just created today! —Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

You do not at all have freedom. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to WP:Teahouse. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Stephanie921 (talk) 03:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Hey, stop! I am not spamming! I am behoving normally! Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

If you don't adjust your behaviour. You're gonna end up blocked. GoodDay (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh, no. That will not happen. I am following etiquette, and don’t wanna get locked up like this user. Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Lobby And TheoTheoDerich, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Theotheoderich (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

-You know, I'm not his alt sockpuppet account. --Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Lobby And TheoTheoDerich, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can . You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorials
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lobby And TheoTheoDerich

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Lobby And TheoTheoDerich, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I want to have liberty please at least! Don't delete it! --Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:USERPAGE -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Lobby And TheoTheoDerich - You've begun a re-creation of the Userpage that an administrator had deleted as advertising or promotion. Userpages are intended for an editor to express their interests in how they will contribute to and edit Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not a personal or commercial website, nor is it a platform for advertising products or services. It is an encyclopedia.

If you are here for reasons other than to build an encyclopedia then this is not for you. Blue Riband► 03:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am NOT a sock of Giratto. I use this account on another iPad which is an completely different /40 address range. --Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Suspiciously specific denial, per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why, you know Giratto? Nythar^T.C 04:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Nythar: NinjaRobotPirate thinks I'm his sockpuppet. I claim to not be his sockpuppet, Ny. Please take a look at this page. Thank you. Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

You've been blocked as a sock of Theotheoderich, which your 'name' strikingly resembles. PS - At this point, your talkpage access should be revoked. GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

GoodDay, I deny that I am Theo's sock. Theo is also Giratto's sock. --Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

So why did you link to User:Breast999A, a sockpuppet of Giratto, above? Nythar^T.C 04:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

How do you know Giratto uses an iPad which is on a completely different /40 address range? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I am his other iPad account. Giratto uses 2601:647:6500::/40 IP range. 2601:204:E600:2050:387D:A544:698C:1C58 (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Also, I am an completely different IP range, so I continue to deny that I’m the same user as User:Giratto. 2601:204:E600:2050:387D:A544:698C:1C58 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't know if this is trolling or just silliness but socking from a different device with a different IP range doesn't make it okay or not socking. Nil Einne (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

It’s not socking. As he said, it’s an completely /64 range. Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Second unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want an better future at Wikipedia. I ensure that I will not do it again and I want to be unblocked because I continue to deny that I am Giratto, because I’m in an completely different /32 range. —Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nothing here is remotely convincing. Yamla (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I (and my IP range) want to be unblocked because I deny any involvment with Giratto socks.

I understand what I had did in the past and why I got blocked. I believe tht this block was a wrong move because I am not the same IP address as Giratto’s. I am not the same person. It should be reversed because like I said, I am not related to Giratto in any form. The blocking administrator blocked me with an CheckUser block, as stated in my reason for blocking. The evidence could be found on User talk:Lobby And TheoTheoDerich#Unblock request. I stated there that I was blocked incorrectly because I wasn’t a sock of Giratto. NinjaRobotPirate advised me to not edit with an account from what I think so far. I am willing for our IP range to continue editing Wikipedia and making it an better society. I assume good faith towards the others, and NinjaRobotPirate, the blocking admin. I agree to follow Wikipedia’s customs, and I admit to it. I want people to trust me again because I am a good editor, not an sockpuppet of Giratto. I will also assume good faith towards myself. Many time my unblock requests have been denied in the past, but I want this to be sucsessful and I want to feel like a normal person. So please, I (and my IP range) am hoping to be unblocked within the horizon. Thank you for building an good Wikipedia community. Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining this as you will need to return to your original account and work on getting the global lock removed first. 331dot (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ADMIN NOTE: My original account User:Giratto is currently globally locked, so I can’t make an appeal to there. Lobby And TheoTheoDerich (talk) 16:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

You say you are not giratto in your unblock request then immediately below it say that it was your original account, both cannot be true at the same time. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)