Welcome!

Hello, LobãoV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Willian das Graças Silva Júnior, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MJ94 00:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Willian das Graças Silva Júnior edit

 

The article Willian das Graças Silva Júnior has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MJ94 00:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marcelo Cordeiro de Souza edit

 

The article Marcelo Cordeiro de Souza has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Usb10 Connected? 18:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Too short edit

Your recent spate of articles on Brazilian footballers are all too short. At a minimum, an article should start with the subject's name and at least a single sentence about who they are. For example:

José Gerardo Moreira Rocha Júnior is a Brazilian footballer who presently plays for Ceará.

Without such minimum information, articles may be deleted as having no content. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Luiz Henrique Corrêa de Araújo, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. The creation of a new WIkipedia article can not be considered a minor edit -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ernandes Dias Luz edit

 

The article Ernandes Dias Luz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable football player fails WP:FOOTY as hasn't played at the highest level of his sport.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mo ainm~Talk 11:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ernandes Dias Luz for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ernandes Dias Luz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernandes Dias Luz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Mo ainm~Talk 11:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reverting updates edit

Please stop reverting updates with no reason as you are cosistently doing on Flamengo page. You may edit and help, but please make sure your informations are correct and have references.Xguilex (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bruno Uvini Bortolança edit

 

The article Bruno Uvini Bortolança has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lucas de Souza Gonçalves edit

 

The article Lucas de Souza Gonçalves has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You MUST include references in any biographical article you write about a living person, and you MUST NOT remove any {{blp-prod}} tags until you do. This is a strict requirement of Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ewerton Emmanuel Miranda Macedo edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ewerton Emmanuel Miranda Macedo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Anderson Luis Chaves Rosa edit

 

A tag has been placed on Anderson Luis Chaves Rosa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Anderson Luis Chaves Rosa, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenedy Silva Reis edit

 

A tag has been placed on Kenedy Silva Reis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Anaílson Brito Noleto edit

 

A tag has been placed on Anaílson Brito Noleto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Administrator's Noticeboard edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your refusal to heed the warnings given to you here on your talk page. The thread is User creating multiple bad articles and ignoring talk page warnings. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Page creations edit

Hi, PLEASE STOP creating empty pages. It is considered disruptive editing and they will be deleted. If you continue, you may also be facing a block from editing the encyclopedia. Consider preparing new articles in your user space and moving them to article pages when they are complete. If you need any help understanding pur policies for new pâge creation, please do not hesitae to ask me on my talk page. Cheers, --Kudpung (talk) 15:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Anaílson Brito Noleto edit

 

The article Anaílson Brito Noleto has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Minimac (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

STOP! edit

Por favor, pare de criar paginas vazias. Caso contrario, você sera bloqueado. --Kudpung (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Read! edit

Don't you read any messege people send to you? It seens to be useless.

Você tem preguiça ou não consegue entender as mensagens que as pessoas enviam para você?Xguilex (talk) 18:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Felipe Anderson Pereira Gomes for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Felipe Anderson Pereira Gomes, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felipe Anderson Pereira Gomes until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Felipe Anderson Pereira Gomes. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luiz Oliveira dos Santos Júnior edit

 

The article Luiz Oliveira dos Santos Júnior has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks context and hasn't been edited in eleven days.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wellington de Jorge Estanislau Paeckart edit

 

The article Wellington de Jorge Estanislau Paeckart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Third creation under a different name. Footballer with no senior team appearances

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindamuse (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gilson Rosa de Jesus edit

 

A tag has been placed on Gilson Rosa de Jesus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mo ainm~Talk 13:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Jacopo Sala edit

  A tag has been placed on Jacopo Sala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

I see that you removed a copyright notice from the article Aziz Deen-Conteh. Perhaps you had not read the notice before removing it, and had not seen that it said "Do not edit this page until an administrator or an OTRS agent has resolved this issue". Please be careful in future to read notices before taking any action concerning them. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent problems with your editing. You have been given numerous messages pointing out problems, but have not responded to them or changed your ways. Please take the opportunity, while your block lasts, to review the messages you have been given, and think how you can avoid making similar mistakes in the future. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro edit

 

The article Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable people, a player that not yet made his professional debut

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matthew_hk tc 03:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Matthew_hk tc 09:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fernando Henrique Quintela Cavalcante for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Fernando Henrique Quintela Cavalcante, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Sérgio Rodrigues Theodoro until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Matthew_hk tc 09:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Orlandini Spessato edit

 

The article Gabriel Orlandini Spessato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Emerson José da Conceição edit

 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Emerson José da Conceição requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Arbiter 15:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Juliano Aparecido dos Santos edit

 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Juliano Aparecido dos Santos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Arbiter 15:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' Noticeboard notice edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding refusal to heed warnings. The thread is "User:LobãoV".Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for You have not responded to talk page messages telling you to stop creating articles about minor, non-notable athletes. You have immediately gone and re-created deleted material without any change to the content. You have removed speedy deletion tags from articles you created.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Updates edit

Vou falar em português porque parece que você não entende inglês ou simplesmente ignora todas as mensagens. Contribua, mas nem tudo tem quer como você quer. Então não simplesmente reverta as contribuições de outras pessoas, e de preferência explique o motivo de você fazer qualquer alteração. Xguilex (talk) 22:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Contributing again edit

I see that you have resumed contributing after your last block. But you still have not made any effort to communicate with users on your talk page about your problematic editing habits. Failure to do so will likely result in a permanent block. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victor Silva de Oliveira edit

 

The article Victor Silva de Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional football player with no appearances

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alex da Silva de Souza edit

 

The article Alex da Silva de Souza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional football player with no appearances

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Josemar Guimarães da Silva edit

 

The article Josemar Guimarães da Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable regional football player with no appearances

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' Noticeboard (again) edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding continued refusal to enter into discussions with the community regarding your creation of non-notable biographies. The thread is "User:LobãoV (third time)".Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been asked to participate in discussions regarding your edits, and have not done so. Until you can convince other editors that your contributions are legitimate you have been blocked from editing. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fillipe Soutto Mayor Nogueira Ferreira edit

 

The article Fillipe Soutto Mayor Nogueira Ferreira has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tikiwont (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leonardo De Campos edit

 

The article Leonardo De Campos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dubious notability, no confirmed appearances and even his own team don't have a photo

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ϢereSpielChequers 00:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Willian Alves de Oliveira edit

 

The article Willian Alves de Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable". Subject fails the Association football requirements of WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Leonardo Silva Vieira edit

  A tag has been placed on Leonardo Silva Vieira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 06:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paulão edit

As you claimed he played for Grêmio Prudente's reserve, i though there is no such team, or could you provide a link? Also i can't find inof that he started his career at Serra Macaense Futebol Clube. Matthew_hk tc 07:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Guilherme Felipe de Castro edit

 

The article Guilherme Felipe de Castro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Eliabe Rosa Guimarães Tinoco edit

 

The article Eliabe Rosa Guimarães Tinoco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rafael Lima Pereira edit

 

The article Rafael Lima Pereira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vitor Coutinho Flora edit

 

The article Vitor Coutinho Flora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

*Delete - one appearance a number years ago (to technically meet NFOOTY) in Campeonato Paulista per Soccerway (the infobox seems wrong) is not enough when he comprehensively fails GNG. Some COMMONSENSE is needed here, and plenty of AFD precedent exists to say that barely passing NFOOTBALL is not enough when you fail GNG, see Oscar Otazu, Vyacheslav Seletskiy, Aleksandr Salimov, Andrei Semenchuk, Artyom Dubovsky, Cosmos Munegabe, Marios Antoniades, Scott Sinclair, Fredrik Hesselberg-Meyer, Matheus Eccard, Roland Szabó (2nd nomination), Metodija Stepanovski, Linas Klimavičius, Takumi Ogawa, Nicky Fish and Andrei Nițu, amongst others. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vitor Coutinho Flora for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitor Coutinho Flora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitor Coutinho Flora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invite to the African Destubathon edit

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Preto (footballer, born July 1986) edit

 

The article Preto (footballer, born July 1986) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 20:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply