Your submission at Articles for creation: Oralvault Radio (June 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Loadtime! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Loadtime (talk) 22:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oralvault Radio (June 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oralvault Radio (June 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oralvault Radio (June 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Laplorfill were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Laplorfill (talk) 03:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oralvault Radio (June 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Laplorfill was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Adding a "source" that is a spam farm is not an improvement. Still no reliable sources. Still no evidence that this topic is notable. Clearly fails WP:NCORP.
Laplorfill (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osaru Obaseki (July 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Osaru Obaseki has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Osaru Obaseki. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osaru Obaseki (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osaru Obaseki (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 10:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osaru Obaseki (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Oralvault Radio

edit

  Hello, Loadtime. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oralvault Radio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Osaru Obaseki

edit

  Hello, Loadtime. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Osaru Obaseki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Oralvault Radio

edit
 

Hello, Loadtime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oralvault Radio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:11, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply