Liztrudon
Joined 19 July 2023
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Liztrudon in topic Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnav Kapur has been accepted
| This is Liztrudon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
- If you have any questions about the draft, please ask them on a talk page so that they can be seen by the community. The draft talk page is best, but either your user talk page (here) or my user talk page is all right. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much @Spinster300 for taking the time out to review this! I shall rework the references according to the guidelines and resubmit. Thank you for your feedback - this helps me become a better editor. :-) Liztrudon (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnav Kapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Liztrudon!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
|
- Thanks @Kline for the feedback! This is helpful.
- I was trying to follow the guidelines verbatim as best as I understood them. I added references that were secondary, independent with no primary influence from the subject, that talked about the relevant detail in the article and were from reliable sources that showed broad coverage (that is why the added number of links - not to unnecessarily populate). I'd appreciate any help as to how I can improve the article? Should I remove some references? Liztrudon (talk) 04:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)- Thank you, @WikiOriginal-9 for reviewing and accepting! This has been a great learning process. I love how collaborative Wikipedia is. :) Liztrudon (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)