Lisa19980325

Welcome!

Hello, Lisa19980325, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisa19980325 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Korea Economic Daily (Hankyung) is the reliable news source but Ïvana keep undoing my edits.

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block has nothing to do with whether or not the source is reliable and everything to do with you edit-warring to re-add the source instead of discussing on the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Instruments

Please stop adding that SUGA plays the piano as a primary instrument. He is CAPABLE of playing the piano but playing the piano is not what he's known for. He's known for being a singer. If you really do think that SUGA plays the piano as a primary instrument, then put it on SUGA's talk page. This could result in an edit war, so let's solve the conflict in an orderly manner. Thank you, SmallPotato ^talk 15:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Mr. Queen

Could you please NOT paste automated translation into the article? Your text makes no sense in English! Xia ^{talk to me} 22:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that is a valid reason to remove the text. It's unintelligible and makes no sense. And please remove WMF from your talk page signature, you are not a WMF employee and if you continue to use that to deceive people, I will report your account to admins. The history anyways preserves your original username edits, you cannot hide your real profile. Xia ^{talk to me} 09:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Suga (rapper); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alex (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisa19980325 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Firstly, Ïvana undo "Min Yun Ki" edit for no reason but only left the word "unnecessary" in The beginning.The source is from the reliable news source ,and the news reports got the official profile from the company in 2015. I have opened up the discussion by Ïvana suggestion. But She insisted on her thoughts and keep undoing the edits. Moreover, it is really rude of her to say Korean namu Wikipedia is not reliable to me, who is a real Korean myself. The bts Wikipedia is more like bts fanpage because they never wrote bts whole controversy on Wikipedia but only namu did that. Secondly, Ïvana mistranslated Korean news title by her own. So I changed her news link and used a more reliable one which has Korean comments under that news link on NAVER. Please give me a convincing evidence that why Ïvana is right and I am worng. I thought I took the partial treatment from bts fans.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you misunderstand the issue. It is not a matter of Ivana being right and you being wrong. It is a matter that Ivana did not violate the three-revert rule, but you did. Your unblock request really needs to focus on your actions. —C.Fred (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Hye-soo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 04:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Please set up the precise rules when the editors update the celebrities' wikipedia. Give me the reason why I can not write about the controversy of BTS. Lisa19980325 (talk) 04:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your edits about BTS are a separate matter, about which I have no opinion. But please stop removing well-sourced content from Kim Hye-soo, or you will be blocked by an administrator again for edit warring. Storchy (talk) 04:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kim Hye-soo, you may be blocked from editing. Storchy (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

July 2023

Your recent editing history at Suga (rapper) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Suga and Buzz Rhythm 02

Given that the source describes Suga as making an emergency appearance on Buzz Rhythm 02, how are you concluding that this is a recurring role suitable for inclusion in the table? —C.Fred (talk) 17:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Inclusion of guesting and/or one-time appearance roles and also music videos on Suga filmography

As stated on my talk page and also through the edit summary twice, as per WP:CONSENSUS at WT:KO (search through the archives), guesting and/or one-time appearances is not allowed for inclusion. Please don't violate consensus. Thanks you! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

And also music videos exists at Suga videography instead which I had stated clearly in the edit summary, if you even bothered reading which I doubt you're doing so. Furthermore, your addition is completely unsourced so I suggest that you do self-revert immediately. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Ïvana. I noticed that you recently removed content from D-Day (album) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ïvana (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)