Speedy deletion of Jarod Pinckney edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jarod Pinckney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 12:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jarod Pinckney. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Dengero (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jarod Pinckney edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jarod Pinckney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jarod Pinckney edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jarod Pinckney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 13:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Jarod Pinckney. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dengero (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Malibu16PackSolarMetalLights.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Malibu16PackSolarMetalLights.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Asher196 (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Flavorettes edit

 

A tag has been placed on Flavorettes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 16:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Flavorettes. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 17:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Flavorettes. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 17:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of Presidents of the United States. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. SGGH speak! 02:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Slang of the 2000s edit

 

A tag has been placed on Slang of the 2000s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sarwicked (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tags edit

Please do not remove the tags from Romiette and Julio. The article needs extensive work: I'm not prepared to delete it, but it's a marginal article at best. Acroterion (talk) 05:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009 edit

  Your recent edit to the page World Wrestling Entertainment appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Esau Jenkins edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Esau Jenkins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —S Marshall Talk/Cont 18:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Romiette and Julio edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Romiette and Julio, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romiette and Julio. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply