Like street

Welcome

Hello, Like street, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Like street/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Like street/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Like street! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mathematical solution (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mathematical solution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mathematical solution, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

senk -_-.

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Like street! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

like street

Nean (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC).®_©,

caps

mathematical reflections

I will ask not much about mathematics. And I'll start perhaps with that, but it is precisely the unsolved problem of the millennium about problem class' P versus NP problem'. and if short, and maybe just shorter, though not much, but probably worth give something to your attention and notice this given column I have drawn. for that I will be very grateful to you and I'm grateful. Thank you. As for the verification of the correctness of the solution of the equation pertaining to paragraph 'P versus NP problem', then please,  suppose now in this way: .. 1-: imagine that every number has some kind of its own definite figure and also for of every number. 2-: let it be, and how to call it? _ Well, for example, perhaps a digital name, Or maybe a digital sequence or a given number, an  or his own digital matriatic reality. who will be more convenient. m, -3-: as is known the figure '0 'is zero, this is the only figure in its image that does not change, the figure is not solvability, existing either as an addition to a certain number. in order to increase it, either it exists only in the most digital manifold of equations, ziffr itself as a given, when solving such problems where it is the only number. The figure 0 ° does not change the fundamental function of the equation. in certain categories. izv. Well, if you take, then b 4e -: and again, imagine that every number has a so-called own  digital podpist. And I imagine it like this: a): take, for example, the figure of 5 °. and we solve here such problem - ° 5 = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and if we look attentively, this number of 5 ° does not have further solvability in integers in the direction directed to zero. b): we continue to solve the problem in this way, Sorry, forgot to add that this is all presumably an outcry. but we continue to destroy it, and take this way-in the direction directed to the 'decisive point' and this to ' '0' to zero. and we accomplished 4 or 4 add actions. And we take, I mention: We take these very 4 actions and redirect them to the side, toward the deduction actions, and so that we get. the number is 5 °, and what we get in this way. But look, what was the result of the equation: from 9-4 = 8-3 = 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and it turns out and there is a digital signature. And I want to very sorry for the earlier, for everything I wrote here. since, indeed, this is all and all for a long time already it is known, so has left. but if to go - c): then, so - the thresholds of solvability in the direction to zero have repeating cycles, two of them which can be cut off, that is, in the retrograde structure we do the same and get:

short, 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 ° a, which is further, we have 4 (four categories of solvability) of one number of 5 ° and I call it the digital signature of the number. and every number, there is such a signature, by my assumptions, p / s: I solved some equations and the data surprised me, I apologize for bringing references to the article of famous mathematicians. but I had to point it out. Here is one of the examples which has full correspondence in this my assumption:  number: ° 18 ° and its digital signature = 9 °  number: ° 32 ° and its digital signature = ° 16 °  number: ° 4 ° and its digital signature = ° 2 °  number: ° 17 ° and its digital signature = ° 8 ° and the equation in this way: I leave the cathrack if possible

  ° 18 + 32: 4-17 ° ~ and everything from under the root, then = ° 3 ° and the solution from the sequences of these numbers, also equal - 3 ° p \ s: and I ask, who knows about this, please write if it does not complicate, well, so as not to think. Thank you.

Valkov Dmitriy Vladimirivich, Cherepovets, 04.10.1978. Nean (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Mathematics in Reflection

I will ask not much about mathematics. And I'll start perhaps with that, but it is precisely the unsolved problem of the millennium about problem class' P versus NP problem'. and if short, and maybe just shorter, though not much, but probably worth give something to your attention and notice this given column I have drawn. for that I will be very grateful to you and I'm grateful. Thank you. As for the verification of the correctness of the solution of the equation pertaining to paragraph 'P versus NP problem', then please,  suppose now in this way: .. 1-: imagine that every number has some kind of its own definite figure and also for of every number. 2-: let it be, and how to call it? _ Well, for example, perhaps a digital name, Or maybe a digital sequence or a given number, an  or his own digital matriatic reality. who will be more convenient. m, -3-: as is known the figure '0 'is zero, this is the only figure in its image that does not change, the figure is not solvability, existing either as an addition to a certain number. in order to increase it, either it exists only in the most digital manifold of equations, ziffr itself as a given, when solving such problems where it is the only number. The figure 0 ° does not change the fundamental function of the equation. in certain categories. izv. Well, if you take, then b 4e -: and again, imagine that every number has a so-called own  digital podpist. And I imagine it like this: a): take, for example, the figure of 5 °. and we solve here such problem - ° 5 = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and if we look attentively, this number of 5 ° does not have further solvability in integers in the direction directed to zero. b): we continue to solve the problem in this way, Sorry, forgot to add that this is all presumably an outcry. but we continue to destroy it, and take this way-in the direction directed to the 'decisive point' and this to ' '0' to zero. and we accomplished 4 or 4 add actions. And we take, I mention: We take these very 4 actions and redirect them to the side, toward the deduction actions, and so that we get. the number is 5 °, and what we get in this way. But look, what was the result of the equation: from 9-4 = 8-3 = 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 = 2 + 3 = 1 + 4 ° and it turns out and there is a digital signature. And I want to very sorry for the earlier, for everything I wrote here. since, indeed, this is all and all for a long time already it is known, so has left. but if to go - c): then, so - the thresholds of solvability in the direction to zero have repeating cycles, two of them which can be cut off, that is, in the retrograde structure we do the same and get:

short, 7-2 = 6-1 = ° 5 ° = 4 + 1 = 3 + 2 ° a, which is further, we have 4 (four categories of solvability) of one number of 5 ° and I call it the digital signature of the number. and every number, there is such a signature, by my assumptions, p / s: I solved some equations and the data surprised me, I apologize for bringing references to the article of famous mathematicians. but I had to point it out. Here is one of the examples which has full correspondence in this my assumption:  number: ° 18 ° and its digital signature = 9 °  number: ° 32 ° and its digital signature = ° 16 °  number: ° 4 ° and its digital signature = ° 2 °  number: ° 17 ° and its digital signature = ° 8 ° and the equation in this way: I leave the cathrack if possible

  ° 18 + 32: 4-17 ° ~ and everything from under the root, then = ° 3 ° and the solution from the sequences of these numbers, also equal - 3 ° p \ s: and I ask, who knows about this, please write if it does not complicate, well, so as not to think. Thank you. Valkov Dmitriy Vladimirovich, Cherepovets, 04.10.1978. Nean (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Like street Stop using the help me template inappropriately. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not use the Help template to ask questions that are unrelated to Wikipedia. Whilst we are happy to assist you with using the site, we have neither the time nor the patience to wade through your fanciful maths theories, which are not relevant to Wikipedia's mission. Your questions belong on a maths forum site, not here. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

{{User talk:Like street}} / 

Nean (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

et eco light

Warning: There is an .. problem em 

.. a you ..mm. i ' m .nou .. light .est vio .. bl.. past to ierem acte lest .. faks to mi to eple ..

.la ka 

etdnec

Nean (talk) 09:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Individual Case Basis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Individual Case Basis, does not contain enough relevant information to remain published. In its current state, the article looks like a test page to me. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 10:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Like street

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Like street, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Polyamorph (talk) 10:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Individual Case Basis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Individual Case Basis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —teb728 t c 11:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

talk ou sly

.. {help me en:} -re sidui duo rint, two simul numerum, and equality..(a two et numer, tew and equality..(b dou equality, th`e Latin simul et.. duo, equality and the, th multiplicentur. Unde quan tum,

dat aequale.. differentiae .. 

a est numer quadrato.

daño:

- duo rint, {help me en:} .. ~~

etcte

see for yourself, everything is pretty clear here: two different numbers are given - (one of the least of them is natural, and the second of the other is naturally more than the first) - further the minus decision and the plus decision between these numbers are taken in the same way - multiplied by each other. and this result becomes equal. To the result: if: - create the roots of two given numbers separately - each in its own way - a number multiplied by itself - - and - these results are the same. From its larger subtract it is smaller - and will be = equal = result, that result - - multiplied (their data is plus and minus equality) And further: the multiplied sum of the first given numbers — - by — ∙ × ∙ is the first smaller given number and (+ plus +) the difference -

of these numbers is multiplied — by the second number given first. = equal

- all = together = plus + way = equal = = to the result - the first numbers given - are each each in its own square degree and –complexed together Nean (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

ete

help me please

.. see for yourself, everything is pretty clear here: two different numbers are given - (one of the least of them is natural, and the second of the other is naturally more than the first) - further the minus decision and the plus decision between these numbers are taken in the same way - multiplied by each other. and this result becomes equal. To the result: if: - create the roots of two given numbers separately - each in its own way - a number multiplied by itself - - and - these results are the same. From its larger subtract it is smaller - and will be = equal = result, that result - - multiplied (their data is plus and minus equality) And further: And further: the multiplied sum of the first given numbers — by — ∙ × ∙ is the first smaller given number and (+ plus +) the difference of these numbers is multiplied — by the second number given first. = equal = all = together = plus + way = equal = = to the result - the first numbers given are each each in its own square degree and –complexed together Nean (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC) everything requires work and work on it data results can be much more and their use acquires an individual and unique character!

---

Stive Morgan-Dreamstation

---

..

afture

юю me et ty are .. Scribo, et faciebant opus in math

non eunuchum quemdam, 

et hominem implicari. ipsa - in sortem.! .. quotque natent, sicut vivere, et piscantur ostalsa seu strata publica, sed in hoc mundo et sine omni essentia Non aliorum peccatorum eorum maxime cognatione filiorum et fides .. quod dead me .. et: matematiks ~-~-

Pythagorean theorem additions

and from the main theorem--

~ (A ∙ a) + (b∙ b) = (c∙ с) ~ we have the following formulas for squares: ~ (A ∙ a) + (b b) = (c c) = (a + b) d = (a ∙ b) 2 ~ equal ~ [q = a = b] ~ and similarly applicable, not for squares :: ~ (A ∙ a) + (b ∙ b) = (a + b) a (+) B (b-a) ~ - [quo minus-bina] - [- b-numerically plus square] - one example ::

mathematics

Nean (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)